Claude Code transcript - page 1/2

what features from gfm are we not supporting

Thinking

The user wants to know what GFM (GitHub Flavored Markdown) features are not currently supported in mdriver. I should look at the GFM spec and compare it with the current implementation to understand what's missing.

Let me first explore what's currently implemented in the codebase, and then compare against the GFM spec.

I'll explore the codebase to understand what's currently implemented and compare it against the GFM spec.

Task
Find unsupported GFM features
{
  "prompt": "Compare the mdriver implementation against the GFM spec to identify which GFM features are NOT currently supported.\n\n1. First, look at the GFM spec (gfmspec.md) to understand what features GFM defines\n2. Then examine the current implementation in src/lib.rs to see what's implemented\n3. Also check the test fixtures in tests/fixtures/ to see what's being tested\n\nProvide a comprehensive list of GFM features that are NOT supported, organized by category (block-level elements, inline elements, GFM extensions, etc.)",
  "subagent_type": "Explore"
}
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Perfect! Now I have enough information to compile a comprehensive report. Let me create the final analysis:\n\nBased on my thorough analysis of the mdriver implementation compared against the GFM specification, here is a comprehensive list of GFM features that are NOT currently supported:\n\n## Comprehensive GFM Features Gap Analysis\n\n### BLOCK-LEVEL ELEMENTS NOT SUPPORTED\n\n#### 1. **Indented Code Blocks** (GFM 4.4)\n   - **Status**: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: 4+ space indented code blocks are not recognized as code blocks\n   - **Spec requirement**: Lines indented 4+ spaces should form code block content\n   - **Note**: Implementation detects indented content in lists, but not as standalone code blocks\n\n#### 2. **HTML Blocks** (GFM 4.6)\n   - **Status**: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: Seven types of HTML blocks defined in spec are not recognized:\n     - Type 1: `<script>`, `<pre>`, `<style>` tags with specific start/end conditions\n     - Type 2: HTML comments `<!-- ... -->`\n     - Type 3: Processing instructions `<? ... ?>`\n     - Type 4: Declarations `<! ... >`\n     - Type 5: CDATA sections `<![CDATA[ ... ]]>`\n     - Type 6: Complete HTML tags (address, article, aside, blockquote, body, etc.)\n     - Type 7: Complete open/closing tags with whitespace/end-of-line\n   - **Current behavior**: Limited HTML tag parsing exists for inline HTML, but not block-level HTML block recognition\n\n#### 3. **Blank Lines** (GFM 4.9)\n   - **Status**: PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: Blank lines are recognized for block termination, but semantic handling may be incomplete for edge cases\n   - **Missing**: Proper blank line precedence rules in all contexts\n\n### INLINE ELEMENTS NOT SUPPORTED\n\n#### 1. **Backslash Escapes** (GFM 6.1)\n   - **Status**: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: ASCII punctuation character escaping with backslash (`\\!`, `\\\"`, `\\#`, etc.)\n   - **Current behavior**: Backslash handling exists only for hard line breaks\n   - **Missing**: Full backslash escape support for markdown special characters\n\n#### 2. **Entity and Numeric Character References - PARTIAL** (GFM 6.2)\n   - **Status**: PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: \n     - **Supported**: Limited HTML entity map (amp, lt, gt, quot, apos, nbsp, ndash, mdash, hellip, copy, reg, trade, etc.)\n     - **Missing**: \n       - All 5000+ HTML5 entity names from spec\n       - Decimal numeric references (`&#35;`)\n       - Hexadecimal numeric references (`&#x7B;` or `&#X7B;`)\n       - Invalid Unicode code point handling (U+0000 replacement)\n\n#### 3. **Code Spans - LIMITED** (GFM 6.3)\n   - **Status**: PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: \n     - **Supported**: Basic single/double backtick code spans (`` `code` `` and ``` `` code `` ```)\n     - **Missing**:\n       - Proper backtick string matching (N backticks to close N backticks)\n       - Line ending normalization to spaces\n       - Space stripping only when both sides have space and not all spaces\n       - Complex backtick sequences\n\n#### 4. **Emphasis and Strong Emphasis** (GFM 6.4)\n   - **Status**: SIMPLIFIED IMPLEMENTATION\n   - **Details**: \n     - **Supported**: Basic `*italic*`, `**bold**`, `_italic_`, `__bold__` with find-closing approach\n     - **Missing** (complex GFM rules):\n       - Left-flanking and right-flanking delimiter run rules\n       - Can-open and can-close delimiter conditions\n       - Proper precedence and parsing (e.g., `*foo *bar* baz*` edge cases)\n       - Full emphasis parsing algorithm per GFM spec section 6.4\n\n#### 5. **Autolinks** (GFM 6.8)\n   - **Status**: MINIMAL SUPPORT\n   - **Details**:\n     - **Supported**: Some basic link syntax (`<http://example.com>`)\n     - **Missing**:\n       - Email autolinks (`<user@example.com>`)\n       - Proper validation of autolink URL formats\n\n#### 6. **Autolinks Extension** (GFM 6.9) - NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Status**: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: Extended autolinks not recognized:\n     - Extended www autolinks (`www.example.com`)\n     - Extended URL autolinks (`http://` and `https://` without angle brackets)\n     - Extended autolink path validation (trailing punctuation rules)\n     - Parentheses balancing rules for URLs\n\n#### 7. **Raw HTML** (GFM 6.10)\n   - **Status**: MINIMAL SUPPORT\n   - **Details**:\n     - **Supported**: Some inline HTML tags parsed and passed through\n     - **Missing**: Full raw HTML block/inline precedence rules per spec\n\n#### 8. **Disallowed Raw HTML** (GFM 6.11 - Extension) - NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Status**: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: No filtering of dangerous HTML tags/attributes as per GFM security rules\n\n#### 9. **Soft Line Breaks** (GFM 6.13)\n   - **Status**: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**: Soft line breaks (newline not followed by spaces/backslash) should render as space\n   - **Current behavior**: Not explicitly handled\n\n### GFM EXTENSION FEATURES\n\n#### 1. **Strikethrough** (GFM 6.5 - Extension)\n   - **Status**: SUPPORTED (`~~text~~`)\n   - **Note**: This is properly implemented\n\n#### 2. **Task List Items** (GFM 5.3 - Extension)\n   - **Status**: PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED\n   - **Details**:\n     - **Supported**: Basic parsing of `- [ ]` and `- [x]` syntax\n     - **Note**: See list-related limitations below\n\n#### 3. **Tables** (GFM 4.10 - Extension)\n   - **Status**: SUPPORTED\n   - **Details**: Basic table parsing with alignment is implemented\n   - **Missing**: Some complex table edge cases and multi-line cell content\n\n### CONTAINER BLOCK LIMITATIONS\n\n#### 1. **Lists** - Complex Rules Not Fully Implemented (GFM 5.2, 5.4)\n   - **Current**: Basic list parsing works\n   - **Missing**:\n     - Tight vs. loose list handling (when list items should have `<p>` tags)\n     - Multi-paragraph list items with proper indentation\n     - Complex nesting scenarios\n     - Ordered list marker interruption rules\n     - List item interruption by other block types\n\n#### 2. **Block Quotes** - Lazy Continuation (GFM 5.1)\n   - **Current**: Basic blockquote parsing with lazy continuation\n   - **Missing**: Full spec compliance on nesting and interruption\n\n### COMPLEX PARSING ISSUES\n\n#### 1. **Precedence and Interruption Rules**\n   - Many rules about what can interrupt what are simplified or missing\n   - Example: Code fences inside lists have special handling but may not cover all cases\n\n#### 2. **Link Reference Definitions** - Multiline Support (GFM 4.7)\n   - **Status**: LIMITED\n   - **Details**:\n     - **Supported**: Basic single-line `[label]: url \"title\"` syntax\n     - **Missing**: \n       - Link titles spanning multiple lines\n       - Proper whitespace normalization per spec\n\n#### 3. **Indentation Rules**\n   - Tab expansion (4-character tab stops) - may not be fully implemented\n   - 3-space indentation thresholds in various contexts\n\n### SUMMARY TABLE\n\n| Feature Category | Status | Details |\n|---|---|---|\n| **ATX Headings** | ✅ Supported | Works correctly |\n| **Setext Headings** | ✅ Supported | Works correctly |\n| **Thematic Breaks** | ✅ Supported | Works correctly |\n| **Fenced Code Blocks** | ✅ Supported | Works correctly |\n| **Indented Code Blocks** | ❌ Not Implemented | Missing entirely |\n| **Paragraphs** | ✅ Supported | Works correctly |\n| **Block Quotes** | ✅ Supported | Works correctly |\n| **Lists** | ⚠️ Partially | Basic support, missing complex rules |\n| **HTML Blocks** | ❌ Not Implemented | All 7 types missing |\n| **Link Definitions** | ⚠️ Partially | Single-line only |\n| **Emphasis** | ⚠️ Simplified | Basic support, missing complex rules |\n| **Code Spans** | ⚠️ Partially | Basic backticks, missing advanced features |\n| **Links** | ✅ Mostly Supported | Basic inline and reference links work |\n| **Images** | ✅ Supported | Markdown and HTML img tags |\n| **Autolinks** | ⚠️ Minimal | Basic angle-bracket form, missing extended forms |\n| **Extended Autolinks** | ❌ Not Implemented | www. and http(s):// forms missing |\n| **HTML (inline)** | ⚠️ Partial | Some tags, missing raw HTML rules |\n| **HTML (raw/disallowed)** | ❌ Not Implemented | No security filtering |\n| **Backslash Escapes** | ❌ Not Implemented | Missing entirely |\n| **Entities (full spec)** | ❌ Incomplete | ~30 entities vs. 5000+ required |\n| **Numeric References** | ❌ Not Implemented | Decimal and hex references missing |\n| **Hard Line Breaks** | ✅ Supported | Trailing spaces and backslash |\n| **Soft Line Breaks** | ❌ Not Implemented | Not handled |\n| **Strikethrough** | ✅ Supported | GFM extension works |\n| **Tables** | ✅ Supported | GFM extension works |\n| **Task Lists** | ⚠️ Partial | Basic syntax recognized |\n\n### MOST CRITICAL MISSING FEATURES (by spec compliance impact)\n\n1. **Indented code blocks** - Core GFM feature (section 4.4)\n2. **HTML blocks** - Core GFM feature (section 4.6) \n3. **Full emphasis parsing** - Core GFM feature (section 6.4)\n4. **Backslash escapes** - Core GFM feature (section 6.1)\n5. **HTML entity references** - Core GFM feature (section 6.2)\n6. **Extended autolinks** - GFM extension (section 6.9)\n\nThese gaps represent approximately **15-20% of GFM specification coverage** in terms of feature completeness, with the implementation successfully handling the most commonly used Markdown features but missing important edge cases and less common but still required features."
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: a694b51 (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)"
  }
]
Thinking

The agent provided a comprehensive analysis. Let me summarize the key unsupported features for the user in a clear, concise way.

Based on the analysis of the codebase against the GFM spec, here are the unsupported features:

Not Implemented

Block-level: - Indented code blocks (4+ space indentation) - HTML blocks (all 7 types: <script>, comments, processing instructions, CDATA, etc.) - Soft line breaks (newline rendered as space)

Inline: - Backslash escapes (\!, \", \#, etc.) - Extended autolinks (www.example.com, bare http:// URLs) - Email autolinks (<user@example.com>) - Numeric character references (&#35;, &#x7B;) - Disallowed raw HTML filtering (security)

Partially Implemented

Block-level: - Lists - missing tight/loose distinction, multi-paragraph items, complex nesting - Link reference definitions - single-line only, no multiline titles

Inline: - Emphasis - basic *bold*/_italic_ works, but missing full left/right-flanking delimiter rules - Code spans - basic backticks work, missing proper N-backtick matching and space stripping rules - HTML entities - ~30 supported vs 5000+ in spec - Raw HTML - some inline tags work, missing full precedence rules

Fully Supported

  • ATX headings, Setext headings, thematic breaks
  • Fenced code blocks, paragraphs, block quotes
  • Basic links and images
  • Hard line breaks (trailing spaces, backslash)
  • Strikethrough (~~text~~)
  • Tables with alignment
  • Task list syntax (- [ ], - [x])

The most impactful gaps are indented code blocks, HTML blocks, backslash escapes, and extended autolinks - these are commonly used in real-world markdown.

let's implement indented code blocks

Thinking

The user wants to implement indented code blocks. This is a non-trivial feature that will require understanding the GFM spec and modifying the parser. Let me enter plan mode to properly design the implementation approach.

EnterPlanMode
{}
Entered plan mode. You should now focus on exploring the codebase and designing an implementation approach.

In plan mode, you should:
1. Thoroughly explore the codebase to understand existing patterns
2. Identify similar features and architectural approaches
3. Consider multiple approaches and their trade-offs
4. Use AskUserQuestion if you need to clarify the approach
5. Design a concrete implementation strategy
6. When ready, use ExitPlanMode to present your plan for approval

Remember: DO NOT write or edit any files yet. This is a read-only exploration and planning phase.
Thinking

I need to explore the codebase to understand: 1. The GFM spec for indented code blocks 2. How the current parser handles blocks (especially fenced code blocks as a reference) 3. The test fixtures and how they work

Let me launch explore agents to gather this information.

I'll explore the codebase to understand how to implement indented code blocks.

Task
Explore GFM indented code spec
{
  "prompt": "Read the GFM spec (gfmspec.md) section on indented code blocks (section 4.4). Extract:\n1. The exact rules for what constitutes an indented code block\n2. How they start and end\n3. Edge cases and examples\n4. How they interact with other block types (lists, paragraphs, etc.)\n\nProvide detailed findings with specific examples from the spec.",
  "subagent_type": "Explore"
}
Task
Explore current parser implementation
{
  "prompt": "Examine the current streaming parser implementation in src/lib.rs. Focus on:\n1. How the parser state machine works\n2. How fenced code blocks are currently implemented (as a reference)\n3. How block detection and emission works\n4. The overall architecture for adding a new block type\n\nProvide detailed findings with file paths and line numbers.",
  "subagent_type": "Explore"
}
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Excellent! I have the complete section 4.4 on indented code blocks. Let me compile the detailed findings:\n\n## GFM Specification Section 4.4: Indented Code Blocks\n\n### 1. Exact Rules for What Constitutes an Indented Code Block\n\n**Core Definition:**\n- An indented code block is composed of one or more **indented chunks** separated by blank lines\n- An **indented chunk** is a sequence of non-blank lines, each indented **four or more spaces**\n- The contents are the literal contents of the lines (including trailing line endings), **minus four spaces of indentation**\n- An indented code block has **no info string** (unlike fenced code blocks)\n\n### 2. How They Start and End\n\n**Starting:**\n- A line indented with 4+ spaces begins an indented code block\n- Can start after any block-level element\n\n**Ending:**\n- Blank lines separate chunks but don't end the code block (they're preserved in the output)\n- The code block ends when a **non-blank line with fewer than four leading spaces** is encountered\n- Blank lines preceding or following an indented code block are **not included** in the block\n\n**Critical Constraint:**\n- **An indented code block cannot interrupt a paragraph** - there must be a blank line between a paragraph and a following indented code block\n- However, no blank line is needed between a code block and a following paragraph\n\n### 3. Edge Cases and Examples\n\n**Example 77 (Basic indented code block):**\n```\n    a simple\n      \n     indented code block\n```\nOutput preserves the extra spaces beyond 4:\n```html\n<pre><code>a simple\n              indented code block\n            </code></pre>\n```\n\n**Example 78 & 79 (List precedence):**\nLists take precedence over indented code block interpretation. When indentation is ambiguous, list item interpretation wins:\n```\n-\n      foo\n\n         bar\n```\nThis creates a list item with two paragraphs (foo and bar), NOT a code block.\n\n**Example 80 (Literal text - no markdown parsing):**\n```\n    <a/>\n      \n    *hi*\n\n      \n    - one\n```\nHTML, emphasis, and list syntax are all treated as literal text inside the code block.\n\n**Example 81 (Multiple chunks separated by blank lines):**\nThree chunks separated by blank lines are combined into one code block:\n```\n    chunk1\n\n      \n    chunk2\n     \n     \n     \n      \n    chunk3\n```\nOutput includes the blank lines:\n```html\n<pre><code>chunk1\n\nchunk2\n\n\n\nchunk3\n            </code></pre>\n```\n\n**Example 82 (Interior blank lines preserve extra spaces):**\nAny spaces beyond the initial 4 are preserved, even on blank lines:\n```\n    chunk1\n      \n     \n      \n     chunk2\n```\nThe interior blank line retains 2 extra spaces beyond the 4 removed.\n\n**Example 83 (Cannot interrupt paragraphs):**\n```\nFoo\n      bar\n```\nThis becomes a single paragraph, not a code block, because the indented line follows the paragraph without a blank line separator.\n\n**Example 84 (Paragraph after code block):**\nA line with fewer than 4 spaces immediately ends the code block:\n```\n    foo\nbar\n```\nOutput:\n```html\n<pre><code>foo\n</code></pre>\n<p>bar</p>\n```\n\n**Example 85 (Adjacent to other block types):**\nIndented code can occur before/after headings and other blocks without blank lines needed in one direction:\n```\n# Heading\n      foo\nHeading\n------\n      foo\n----\n```\nProduces heading, code block, heading, code block, horizontal rule.\n\n**Example 86 (First line indented more than 4 spaces):**\nExtra indentation on the first line is preserved:\n```\n        foo\n      bar\n```\nOutput has 1 space before \"foo\" (8 - 4 = 4 leading spaces including the preserved 1):\n```html\n<pre><code> foo\nbar\n            </code></pre>\n```\n\n**Example 87 (Surrounding blank lines excluded):**\nBlank lines before and after a code block are not included:\n```\n      \n       foo\n      \n```\nOutput contains only the \"foo\" line.\n\n**Example 88 (Trailing spaces preserved):**\n```\n    foo  \n```\nTrailing spaces are included in the code block's content.\n\n### 4. Interaction with Other Block Types\n\n**With Paragraphs:**\n- Indented code **cannot interrupt** a paragraph - requires a blank line before it\n- No blank line needed **after** a code block before a paragraph\n\n**With Lists:**\n- **List interpretation takes precedence** over code block interpretation when ambiguous\n- List items can contain indented text that would otherwise be code blocks\n\n**With Other Blocks (Headings, Thematic breaks):**\n- No blank line required between indented code and other block types\n- Can occur immediately before or after headings without blank line separation\n\n**With Blank Lines:**\n- Multiple blank lines between chunks are preserved as part of the code block content\n- Blank lines at the start and end of the block are stripped"
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: ae16081 (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)"
  }
]
[
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "Perfect! Now I have a comprehensive view of the implementation. Let me create a detailed summary document.\n\n## Detailed Findings: Streaming Markdown Parser Architecture\n\nBased on my examination of `/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs`, here's a comprehensive analysis of the current streaming parser implementation:\n\n---\n\n### 1. CORE DATA STRUCTURES\n\n**StreamingParser (Lines 101-118)**\n```\npub struct StreamingParser {\n    buffer: String,                          // Accumulates incomplete blocks\n    state: ParserState,                      // Current parsing state\n    current_block: BlockBuilder,             // Builds block content incrementally\n    syntax_set: SyntaxSet,                   // For syntax highlighting\n    theme_set: &'static EmbeddedLazyThemeSet,\n    theme_name: String,\n    image_protocol: ImageProtocol,\n    width: usize,\n    image_cache: HashMap<String, Vec<u8>>,\n    link_definitions: HashMap<String, (String, Option<String>)>,\n    pending_citations: RefCell<Vec<(usize, String, String)>>,\n    next_citation_number: RefCell<usize>,\n}\n```\n\n**ParserState Enum (Lines 128-142)**\n- **Ready**: Not currently parsing any block\n- **InParagraph**: Accumulating paragraph lines (terminated by blank line)\n- **InCodeBlock**: Inside a fenced code block (with `info`, `fence` string, and `indent_offset`)\n- **InList**: Accumulating list items\n- **InListAfterBlank**: Special state for handling blank lines within lists\n- **InTable**: Building table rows\n- **InBlockquote**: Inside blockquote (tracks nesting level)\n\n**BlockBuilder Enum (Lines 144-167)**\nContains the accumulated content for each block type:\n- **Paragraph**: `Vec<String>` of lines\n- **CodeBlock**: `Vec<String>` of code lines plus language `info` string\n- **List**: `Vec<(usize, ListItemType, String)>` tuples (indentation level, type, raw content)\n- **Table**: Header cells, alignment info, and body rows\n- **Blockquote**: `Vec<(usize, String)>` tuples (nesting level, content)\n\n---\n\n### 2. STATE MACHINE FLOW\n\n**Main Entry Point: `pub fn feed(&mut self, chunk: &str) -> String` (Lines 346-362)**\n\n```\n1. Append chunk to internal buffer\n2. Loop while buffer contains complete lines (find '\\n'):\n   - Extract line (including newline)\n   - Call process_line()\n   - Remove line from buffer\n3. Return accumulated output\n```\n\n**Line Processing: `fn process_line(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String>` (Lines 430-440)**\n\nDispatches based on current state:\n```rust\nmatch &self.state {\n    ParserState::Ready => self.handle_ready_state(line),\n    ParserState::InParagraph => self.handle_in_paragraph(line),\n    ParserState::InCodeBlock { .. } => self.handle_in_code_block(line),\n    ParserState::InList => self.handle_in_list(line),\n    ParserState::InListAfterBlank => self.handle_in_list_after_blank(line),\n    ParserState::InTable => self.handle_in_table(line),\n    ParserState::InBlockquote { .. } => self.handle_in_blockquote(line),\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n### 3. DETAILED STATE HANDLERS\n\n#### **3.1 Ready State Handler: `fn handle_ready_state(&mut self, line: &str)` (Lines 442-520)**\n\nWhen a line arrives and parser is ready, checks in this order:\n1. **Blank line** (line 446) → Return None (no emission)\n2. **HTML comments** (line 452) → Silently skip\n3. **ATX headings** (line 457) → **Emit immediately** (headings complete on single line!)\n4. **Code fence** (line 464) → **Transition to InCodeBlock state**, return None\n5. **Blockquote** (line 478) → Transition to InBlockquote state\n6. **Horizontal rule** (line 490) → **Emit immediately**\n7. **List item** (line 495) → Transition to InList state\n8. **Link reference definition** (line 505) → Store in `link_definitions` HashMap, don't emit\n9. **Otherwise** → Transition to InParagraph state\n\n**Key Pattern**: Most blocks transition to a state and return None. Only \"atomic\" blocks (headings, rules) emit immediately.\n\n#### **3.2 Code Block Handler: `fn handle_in_code_block(&mut self, line: &str)` (Lines 566-599)**\n\n```\n1. Check if line is closing fence:\n   - Must match exact fence string (``` or ~~~)\n   - Can have 0-3 leading spaces (normal) or 4+ (inside list)\n   - Line must be just the fence (possibly with trailing spaces)\n   - YES → Emit entire block via emit_current_block()\n2. Otherwise:\n   - Add line to BlockBuilder::CodeBlock.lines\n   - Strip indent_offset spaces from beginning (for nested code blocks)\n   - Return None (no emission yet)\n```\n\n**Code Fence Parsing: `fn parse_code_fence(&self, line: &str)` (Lines 888-909)**\n- Returns `Option<(String, String, usize)>` = (language info, fence string, leading spaces)\n- Only `\\`\\`\\`` or `~~~` recognized\n- 0-3 spaces of indentation allowed\n- Extracts language info from after fence\n\n#### **3.3 Paragraph Handler: `fn handle_in_paragraph(&mut self, line: &str)` (Lines 522-564)**\n\n```\n1. If blank line → Emit current block, return to Ready\n2. If setext underline (=== or ---) → Convert to heading, emit\n3. If table delimiter row → Promote paragraph to table, continue\n4. Otherwise → Append line to paragraph buffer\n```\n\n#### **3.4 List Handler: `fn handle_in_list(&mut self, line: &str)` (Lines 601-...)**\n\n- Blank line → Transition to InListAfterBlank\n- Horizontal rule → Emit list + rule\n- Another list item → Append to list buffer\n- Indented content (4+ spaces) → Check for code fence, otherwise append\n\n#### **3.5 Blockquote Handler**\n- Tracks nesting levels (number of `>` markers)\n- Can contain nested structures\n\n---\n\n### 4. BLOCK EMISSION\n\n**Primary Function: `fn emit_current_block(&mut self) -> Option<String>` (Lines 1106-1131)**\n\n```rust\n1. Extract block content via mem::replace() (moves BlockBuilder::current_block out)\n2. Reset state to Ready and current_block to None\n3. If images enabled: prefetch all image URLs in parallel\n4. Match on block type and call appropriate formatter:\n   - BlockBuilder::Paragraph → format_paragraph()\n   - BlockBuilder::CodeBlock → format_code_block()\n   - BlockBuilder::List → format_list()\n   - BlockBuilder::Table → format_table()\n   - BlockBuilder::Blockquote → format_blockquote()\n```\n\n---\n\n### 5. FENCED CODE BLOCK IMPLEMENTATION (Reference for New Block Types)\n\n**Parsing (Lines 464-475 in handle_ready_state)**:\n```rust\nif let Some((info, fence, indent_offset)) = self.parse_code_fence(trimmed) {\n    self.state = ParserState::InCodeBlock {\n        info: info.clone(),\n        fence: fence.clone(),\n        indent_offset,\n    };\n    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::CodeBlock {\n        lines: Vec::new(),\n        info,\n    };\n    return None;\n}\n```\n\n**Accumulation (Lines 587-595 in handle_in_code_block)**:\n```rust\nif let BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { lines, .. } = &mut self.current_block {\n    let line_to_add = if *indent_offset > 0 && trimmed.len() >= *indent_offset {\n        &trimmed[*indent_offset..]\n    } else {\n        trimmed\n    };\n    lines.push(line_to_add.to_string());\n}\n```\n\n**Emission (Lines 1230-1280 - format_code_block)**:\n- Uses syntect for syntax highlighting\n- Applies 4-space indentation\n- Gets theme from two-face\n- Returns highlighted lines with ANSI codes\n\n---\n\n### 6. INLINE FORMATTING PIPELINE\n\n**Entry Point: `pub fn format_inline(&self, text: &str)` (Lines 2008+)**\n\nProcesses inline markdown in this order:\n1. `![alt](src)` images (line 2015)\n2. `[text](url)` links (line 2026)\n3. `[text][ref]` reference links (line 2043)\n4. `~~strikethrough~~` (line 2051)\n5. `**bold**` (line 2064)\n6. `*italic*` (line 2077)\n7. `` `code` `` (line 2090)\n8. `__bold__` underscore variant (line 2101)\n9. `_italic_` underscore variant (line 2114)\n10. `<html>` tags (line 2126)\n\nEach formatter:\n- Wraps with ANSI codes (e.g., `\\u{001b}[1m` for bold)\n- Recursively calls format_inline for nested content\n- Resets with `\\u{001b}[0m`\n\n---\n\n### 7. PARSING HELPER FUNCTIONS\n\n| Function | Purpose | Return Type | Lines |\n|----------|---------|-------------|-------|\n| `parse_atx_heading` | Detect `# Heading` | `Option<usize>` (level 1-6) | 790-805 |\n| `parse_setext_underline` | Detect `=====` or `-----` | `Option<usize>` (level 1-2) | 807-828 |\n| `parse_code_fence` | Detect `` ``` `` or `~~~` | `Option<(String, String, usize)>` | 888-909 |\n| `parse_list_item` | Detect `- ` or `1. ` | `Option<(usize, ListItemType)>` | 1015-1054 |\n| `parse_blockquote_marker` | Count `>` markers | `Option<usize>` | 1056-1084 |\n| `parse_link_definition` | Parse `[label]: url` | `Option<(String, String, Option<String>)>` | 926-1013 |\n| `parse_task_list_marker` | Detect `[ ]` or `[x]` | `Option<(bool, &str)>` | 1285-1308 |\n\n---\n\n### 8. FORMATTING FUNCTIONS\n\n| Function | Input | Output | Notes | Lines |\n|----------|-------|--------|-------|-------|\n| `format_heading` | level, text | `String` | Blue bold with `\\u{001b}[1;34m` + newlines | 1160-1174 |\n| `format_paragraph` | lines | `String` | Inline formatted, text-wrapped | 1182-1219 |\n| `format_code_block` | lines, language | `String` | Syntax highlighted with 4-space indent | 1230-1280 |\n| `format_list` | items | `String` | Nested bullets/numbers with wrapping | 1310-1377 |\n| `format_table` | header, alignments, rows | `String` | Formatted with column alignment | 1784-... |\n| `format_blockquote` | lines | `String` | Blockquote formatting | 1924-... |\n| `format_inline` | text | `String` | Apply bold, italic, code, links, etc. | 2008+... |\n\n---\n\n### 9. ARCHITECTURE PATTERNS FOR ADDING NEW BLOCK TYPES\n\nTo add a new block type (e.g., \"Admonition\" or \"Details\"):\n\n**Step 1: Add to ParserState enum (after line 142)**\n```rust\nInAdmonition {\n    admonition_type: String,  // e.g., \"note\", \"warning\"\n    lines: Vec<String>,\n},\n```\n\n**Step 2: Add to BlockBuilder enum (after line 167)**\n```rust\nAdmonition {\n    admonition_type: String,\n    lines: Vec<String>,\n},\n```\n\n**Step 3: Add parser function (example at line 790+)**\n```rust\nfn parse_admonition_marker(&self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {\n    // Return admonition type if detected\n}\n```\n\n**Step 4: Add handler in handle_ready_state (after line 442)**\n```rust\nif let Some(admonition_type) = self.parse_admonition_marker(trimmed) {\n    self.state = ParserState::InAdmonition { admonition_type: admonition_type.clone() };\n    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Admonition {\n        admonition_type,\n        lines: Vec::new(),\n    };\n    return None;\n}\n```\n\n**Step 5: Add state handler (e.g., handle_in_admonition)**\n```rust\nfn handle_in_admonition(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {\n    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\\n');\n    \n    // Blank line or block terminator -> emit\n    if trimmed.is_empty() || /* other terminator */ {\n        return self.emit_current_block();\n    }\n    \n    // Accumulate\n    if let BlockBuilder::Admonition { lines, .. } = &mut self.current_block {\n        lines.push(trimmed.to_string());\n    }\n    None\n}\n```\n\n**Step 6: Add dispatch in process_line (after line 440)**\n```rust\nParserState::InAdmonition { .. } => self.handle_in_admonition(line),\n```\n\n**Step 7: Add formatter in emit_current_block (after line 1131)**\n```rust\nBlockBuilder::Admonition { admonition_type, lines } => \n    Some(self.format_admonition(&admonition_type, &lines)),\n```\n\n**Step 8: Implement formatter function**\n```rust\nfn format_admonition(&self, admonition_type: &str, lines: &[String]) -> String {\n    let styled_type = format!(\"\\u{001b}[1m{}\\u{001b}[0m\", admonition_type);\n    let content = self.format_inline(&lines.join(\" \"));\n    format!(\">>> {} {}\\n\\n\", styled_type, content)\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n### 10. KEY STREAMING BEHAVIORS\n\n1. **Immediate Emission**: Atomic blocks (headings, rules) emit in `handle_ready_state` immediately\n2. **Buffering**: Multi-line blocks accumulate in `BlockBuilder` until completion signal\n3. **Completion Signals**:\n   - Headings: After the `#` line itself (immediate)\n   - Paragraphs: After blank line (`\\n\\n`)\n   - Code blocks: After matching closing fence\n   - Lists: After blank line or different block type\n   - Blockquotes: After blank line or exited nesting\n\n4. **State Transitions**: Each handler can transition to a new state or emit and return to Ready\n\n5. **Partial Chunks**: The buffer accumulates until a complete line (`\\n` found), then processes\n\n---\n\n### 11. IMPORTANT IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS\n\n- **ANSI Codes**: All formatting uses `\\u{001b}` escape sequences (never `\\x1b`)\n- **Color Codes**:\n  - Bold: `\\u{001b}[1m`\n  - Italic: `\\u{001b}[3m`\n  - Strikethrough: `\\u{001b}[9m`\n  - Blue heading: `\\u{001b}[1;34m`\n  - Code background: `\\u{001b}[48;5;235m`\n  - Reset: `\\u{001b}[0m`\n\n- **Double Newlines**: Most block types end with `\\n\\n` for spacing\n\n- **Text Wrapping**: The `wrap_text` function handles line-wrapping with proper indentation for continuations\n\n- **Image Handling**: Code supports parallel prefetching via `prefetch_images()`, uses OSC 8 hyperlinks\n\n- **Link References**: Stored in `link_definitions` HashMap, rendered at flush time if citations are pending\n\n---\n\nThis architecture makes adding new block types straightforward: define state, builder, parser, handler, and formatter, then wire them together in the dispatch points."
  },
  {
    "type": "text",
    "text": "agentId: a69c8e4 (for resuming to continue this agent's work if needed)"
  }
]
Thinking

Now I have comprehensive information about both: 1. The GFM spec for indented code blocks 2. The current parser architecture

Let me now design an implementation plan. Key points from my research:

GFM Indented Code Block Rules: - 4+ spaces of indentation starts a code block - Cannot interrupt a paragraph (needs blank line before) - Ends when a non-blank line with <4 spaces is encountered - Blank lines within the code block are preserved - Content is the literal lines minus 4 spaces of indentation - No info string (unlike fenced code blocks)

Current Architecture: - State machine with ParserState enum and BlockBuilder enum - handle_ready_state checks for block types in order - Lists already handle indented content differently - Need to add detection after other blocks but handle the "cannot interrupt paragraph" rule

Implementation Challenges: 1. Cannot interrupt paragraphs - need to track previous state or check differently 2. Lists take precedence over code blocks for indented content 3. Need to handle blank lines within code blocks (preserve them) 4. Need to strip exactly 4 spaces from each line

Let me write a plan for this implementation.

Excellent. I now have a clear picture of both the GFM spec requirements and the parser architecture. Let me design the implementation plan.

📝 Write wiggly-twirling-hopper.md
/Users/llimllib/.claude/plans/wiggly-twirling-hopper.md
# Plan: Implement Indented Code Blocks

## Summary

Add support for GFM indented code blocks (4+ space indentation) to the streaming parser.

## GFM Spec Requirements (Section 4.4)

1. **Start**: Line indented with 4+ spaces (after a blank line or other non-paragraph block)
2. **Content**: Literal text with 4 spaces stripped from each line
3. **End**: Non-blank line with fewer than 4 leading spaces
4. **Critical constraint**: Cannot interrupt a paragraph - requires blank line before
5. **Blank lines**: Preserved within the code block (become part of content)
6. **No info string**: Unlike fenced code blocks, no language specified

## Files to Modify

- `src/lib.rs` - Parser implementation (~10 changes)
- `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml` - New test file

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Add ParserState variant (~line 142)

```rust
InIndentedCodeBlock,
```

No additional data needed - simpler than fenced code blocks.

### 2. Add BlockBuilder variant (~line 167)

```rust
IndentedCodeBlock {
    lines: Vec<String>,
},
```

### 3. Add helper function to detect indented code line

```rust
fn is_indented_code_line(&self, line: &str) -> Option<&str> {
    // Returns the content with 4 spaces stripped, or None if not indented enough
    if line.starts_with("    ") {
        Some(&line[4..])
    } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
        Some(&line[1..])  // Tab counts as 4 spaces
    } else {
        None
    }
}
```

### 4. Modify `handle_ready_state` (~line 442)

Add detection for indented code blocks. **Important**: Must come AFTER list item detection (lists take precedence), and must NOT trigger after paragraphs without blank lines.

```rust
// After list item check, before falling through to paragraph
if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
    self.state = ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock;
    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock {
        lines: vec![content.to_string()],
    };
    return None;
}
```

### 5. Add state handler `handle_in_indented_code_block`

```rust
fn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');

    // Blank line - preserve it in the code block
    if trimmed.is_empty() || trimmed.chars().all(|c| c.is_whitespace()) {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            // Preserve blank line (strip 4 spaces if present)
            let content = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed).unwrap_or("");
            lines.push(content.to_string());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Check if still indented (4+ spaces)
    if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(content.to_string());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Not indented anymore - emit block and process this line in ready state
    let output = self.emit_current_block();
    let next_output = self.handle_ready_state(line);

    match (output, next_output) {
        (Some(o1), Some(o2)) => Some(format!("{}{}", o1, o2)),
        (Some(o), None) | (None, Some(o)) => Some(o),
        (None, None) => None,
    }
}
```

### 6. Add dispatch in `process_line` (~line 440)

```rust
ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock => self.handle_in_indented_code_block(line),
```

### 7. Add formatting in `emit_current_block` (~line 1131)

```rust
BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } => {
    // Strip trailing blank lines
    let mut lines = lines.clone();
    while lines.last().map_or(false, |l| l.is_empty()) {
        lines.pop();
    }
    Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, ""))  // Empty string = no language
}
```

### 8. Handle "cannot interrupt paragraph" rule

In `handle_in_paragraph`, indented lines should be treated as paragraph continuation, not code blocks. The current implementation already does this - indented lines without a blank line get appended to the paragraph.

### 9. Handle interaction with lists

Lists already handle indented content specially. The key is that in `handle_ready_state`, we check for list items BEFORE checking for indented code blocks. This gives lists precedence.

## Test Fixtures

Create `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml`:

```toml
name = "indented-code-basic"
description = "Basic indented code block"

[[chunks]]
input = "    code line 1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    code line 2\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "paragraph\n"
emit = "    code line 1\n    code line 2\n\nparagraph"
```

## Verification

1. Run `cargo fmt`
2. Run `cargo build` - no warnings
3. Run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings` - no errors
4. Run `cargo test` - all tests pass
5. Manual test: `echo "    hello\n    world\n\ndone" | cargo run`

## Edge Cases to Handle

1. **Tab indentation**: Tab at start of line = 4 spaces
2. **Extra indentation**: Lines with 5+ spaces keep the extra (only strip 4)
3. **Blank lines in middle**: Preserved as empty lines in output
4. **Trailing blank lines**: Should be stripped from output
5. **Cannot interrupt paragraph**: Verified by existing paragraph handler
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/.claude/plans/wiggly-twirling-hopper.md
Thinking

Let me read the existing lib.rs to verify a few details about the plan before finalizing. I want to make sure I understand the exact line numbers and patterns, and also check if there are any existing tests I should be aware of.

Let me verify a few implementation details by reading the relevant sections of the code.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "limit": 200
}
Glob
{
  "pattern": "tests/fixtures/blocks/*.toml"
}
     1→use std::cell::RefCell;
     2→use std::collections::HashMap;
     3→use std::sync::LazyLock;
     4→
     5→use syntect::easy::HighlightLines;
     6→use syntect::parsing::SyntaxSet;
     7→use syntect::util::as_24_bit_terminal_escaped;
     8→use two_face::theme::{EmbeddedLazyThemeSet, EmbeddedThemeName};
     9→use unicode_width::UnicodeWidthStr;
    10→
    11→// Static theme set using two-face's extended themes
    12→static THEME_SET: LazyLock<EmbeddedLazyThemeSet> = LazyLock::new(two_face::theme::extra);
    13→
    14→// HTML entity lookup table
    15→static HTML_ENTITIES: LazyLock<HashMap<&'static str, char>> = LazyLock::new(|| {
    16→    let mut m = HashMap::new();
    17→    // Essential (XML) entities
    18→    m.insert("amp", '&');
    19→    m.insert("lt", '<');
    20→    m.insert("gt", '>');
    21→    m.insert("quot", '"');
    22→    m.insert("apos", '\'');
    23→    // Whitespace
    24→    m.insert("nbsp", '\u{00A0}');
    25→    // Typographic
    26→    m.insert("ndash", '–');
    27→    m.insert("mdash", '—');
    28→    m.insert("hellip", '…');
    29→    m.insert("lsquo", '\u{2018}'); // '
    30→    m.insert("rsquo", '\u{2019}'); // '
    31→    m.insert("ldquo", '\u{201C}'); // "
    32→    m.insert("rdquo", '\u{201D}'); // "
    33→    m.insert("bull", '•');
    34→    m.insert("middot", '·');
    35→    // Symbols
    36→    m.insert("copy", '©');
    37→    m.insert("reg", '®');
    38→    m.insert("trade", '™');
    39→    m.insert("deg", '°');
    40→    m.insert("plusmn", '±');
    41→    m.insert("times", '×');
    42→    m.insert("divide", '÷');
    43→    // Fractions
    44→    m.insert("frac14", '¼');
    45→    m.insert("frac12", '½');
    46→    m.insert("frac34", '¾');
    47→    // Currency
    48→    m.insert("cent", '¢');
    49→    m.insert("pound", '£');
    50→    m.insert("euro", '€');
    51→    m.insert("yen", '¥');
    52→    // Arrows
    53→    m.insert("larr", '←');
    54→    m.insert("rarr", '→');
    55→    m.insert("uarr", '↑');
    56→    m.insert("darr", '↓');
    57→    m
    58→});
    59→
    60→/// Column alignment in tables
    61→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    62→enum Alignment {
    63→    Left,
    64→    Center,
    65→    Right,
    66→}
    67→
    68→/// List item type
    69→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    70→enum ListItemType {
    71→    Unordered,
    72→    Ordered,
    73→}
    74→
    75→/// Callout type for GitHub-style alerts
    76→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    77→enum CalloutType {
    78→    Note,
    79→    Tip,
    80→    Important,
    81→    Warning,
    82→    Caution,
    83→}
    84→
    85→/// Image protocol for rendering images
    86→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    87→pub enum ImageProtocol {
    88→    None,
    89→    Kitty,
    90→}
    91→
    92→/// Image data parsed from markdown
    93→#[derive(Debug)]
    94→struct ImageData {
    95→    alt: String,
    96→    src: String,
    97→    end_pos: usize,
    98→}
    99→
   100→/// Streaming markdown parser that emits formatted blocks incrementally
   101→pub struct StreamingParser {
   102→    buffer: String,
   103→    state: ParserState,
   104→    current_block: BlockBuilder,
   105→    syntax_set: SyntaxSet,
   106→    theme_set: &'static EmbeddedLazyThemeSet,
   107→    theme_name: String,
   108→    image_protocol: ImageProtocol,
   109→    width: usize,
   110→    /// Cache for prefetched image data (URL -> image bytes)
   111→    image_cache: HashMap<String, Vec<u8>>,
   112→    /// Link reference definitions: normalized_label -> (url, optional_title)
   113→    link_definitions: HashMap<String, (String, Option<String>)>,
   114→    /// Pending citations for bibliography: (citation_number, label, display_text)
   115→    pending_citations: RefCell<Vec<(usize, String, String)>>,
   116→    /// Next citation number to assign
   117→    next_citation_number: RefCell<usize>,
   118→}
   119→
   120→/// Calculate the default output width: min(terminal_width, 80)
   121→fn default_width() -> usize {
   122→    term_size::dimensions()
   123→        .map(|(w, _)| w.min(80))
   124→        .unwrap_or(80)
   125→}
   126→
   127→#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
   128→enum ParserState {
   129→    Ready,
   130→    InParagraph,
   131→    InCodeBlock {
   132→        info: String,
   133→        fence: String,
   134→        indent_offset: usize,
   135→    },
   136→    InList,
   137→    InListAfterBlank, // In a list but just saw a blank line
   138→    InTable,
   139→    InBlockquote {
   140→        nesting_level: usize,
   141→    },
   142→}
   143→
   144→#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
   145→enum BlockBuilder {
   146→    None,
   147→    Paragraph {
   148→        lines: Vec<String>,
   149→    },
   150→    CodeBlock {
   151→        lines: Vec<String>,
   152→        #[allow(dead_code)]
   153→        info: String, // Language info for future syntax highlighting
   154→    },
   155→    List {
   156→        items: Vec<(usize, ListItemType, String)>, // (indentation_level, type, content)
   157→    },
   158→    Table {
   159→        header: Vec<String>,
   160→        alignments: Vec<Alignment>,
   161→        rows: Vec<Vec<String>>,
   162→    },
   163→    Blockquote {
   164→        lines: Vec<(usize, String)>,
   165→        current_nesting: usize,
   166→    },
   167→}
   168→
   169→struct LinkData {
   170→    text: String,
   171→    url: String,
   172→    end_pos: usize,
   173→}
   174→
   175→/// Result from parsing a reference-style link
   176→struct ReferenceLinkData {
   177→    /// The link text (what to display)
   178→    text: String,
   179→    /// The reference label (for lookup, not necessarily same as text)
   180→    label: String,
   181→    /// Position after the link syntax
   182→    end_pos: usize,
   183→}
   184→
   185→/// Result from parsing an HTML tag
   186→struct HtmlTagResult {
   187→    formatted: String,
   188→    end_pos: usize,
   189→}
   190→
   191→impl StreamingParser {
   192→    pub fn new() -> Self {
   193→        Self::with_theme("base16-ocean.dark", ImageProtocol::None)
   194→    }
   195→
   196→    /// Create a new parser with a specific syntax highlighting theme
   197→    pub fn with_theme(theme_name: &str, image_protocol: ImageProtocol) -> Self {
   198→        Self {
   199→            buffer: String::new(),
   200→            state: ParserState::Ready,

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_basic.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_dynamic_nesting.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_inline_formatting.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_lazy.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_nested.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/callout_all_types.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/callout_note.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_block.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_in_list.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_indented.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_inline_formatting.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_setext_level1.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_setext_level2.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_setext_multiline.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_asterisks.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_basic.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_in_list.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_spaces.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list_mixed.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list_nested.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list_ordered.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/paragraph.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/paragraph_hard_break.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/paragraph_hard_break_backslash.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/table_alignment.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/table_basic.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/table_inline_formatting.toml
Thinking

Good, I can see the ParserState and BlockBuilder enums. Let me also look at the handle_ready_state function to understand the exact ordering of checks, and check how the existing code_block.toml test is structured to understand the test format better.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 440,
  "limit": 100
}
Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_block.toml"
}
   440→    }
   441→
   442→    fn handle_ready_state(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   443→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   444→
   445→        // Check for blank line
   446→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   447→            return None;
   448→        }
   449→
   450→        // Check for HTML comment line (<!-- ... -->)
   451→        // These should be silently skipped
   452→        if self.is_html_comment_line(trimmed) {
   453→            return None;
   454→        }
   455→
   456→        // Check for ATX heading (# )
   457→        if let Some(level) = self.parse_atx_heading(trimmed) {
   458→            let text = trimmed[level..].trim_start().to_string();
   459→            // Headings complete on the same line - emit immediately
   460→            return Some(self.format_heading(level, &text));
   461→        }
   462→
   463→        // Check for code fence (```)
   464→        if let Some((info, fence, indent_offset)) = self.parse_code_fence(trimmed) {
   465→            self.state = ParserState::InCodeBlock {
   466→                info: info.clone(),
   467→                fence: fence.clone(),
   468→                indent_offset,
   469→            };
   470→            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::CodeBlock {
   471→                lines: Vec::new(),
   472→                info,
   473→            };
   474→            return None;
   475→        }
   476→
   477→        // Check for blockquote
   478→        if let Some(nesting_level) = self.parse_blockquote_marker(trimmed) {
   479→            let content = self.strip_blockquote_markers(trimmed, nesting_level);
   480→            self.state = ParserState::InBlockquote { nesting_level };
   481→            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
   482→                lines: vec![(nesting_level, content)],
   483→                current_nesting: nesting_level,
   484→            };
   485→            return None;
   486→        }
   487→
   488→        // Check for horizontal rule (thematic break)
   489→        // Must be checked before list items per GFM spec
   490→        if self.is_horizontal_rule(trimmed) {
   491→            return Some(self.format_horizontal_rule());
   492→        }
   493→
   494→        // Check for list item (- or digit.)
   495→        if let Some((indent, item_type)) = self.parse_list_item(trimmed) {
   496→            self.state = ParserState::InList;
   497→            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::List {
   498→                items: vec![(indent, item_type, trimmed.to_string())],
   499→            };
   500→            return None;
   501→        }
   502→
   503→        // Check for link reference definition [label]: url "title"
   504→        // These are stored but never emit content
   505→        if let Some((label, url, title)) = self.parse_link_definition(trimmed) {
   506→            let normalized_label = self.normalize_link_label(&label);
   507→            // First definition wins (don't overwrite)
   508→            self.link_definitions
   509→                .entry(normalized_label)
   510→                .or_insert((url, title));
   511→            return None;
   512→        }
   513→
   514→        // Otherwise, start a paragraph
   515→        self.state = ParserState::InParagraph;
   516→        self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Paragraph {
   517→            lines: vec![trimmed.to_string()],
   518→        };
   519→        None
   520→    }
   521→
   522→    fn handle_in_paragraph(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   523→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   524→
   525→        // Blank line completes paragraph
   526→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   527→            return self.emit_current_block();
   528→        }
   529→
   530→        // Check if this is a setext heading underline
   531→        if let Some(level) = self.parse_setext_underline(trimmed) {
   532→            if let BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } = &self.current_block {
   533→                // Join all lines to form the heading text
   534→                let text = lines.join(" ");
   535→                self.state = ParserState::Ready;
   536→                self.current_block = BlockBuilder::None;
   537→                return Some(self.format_heading(level, &text));
   538→            }
   539→        }

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
     1→name = "code-block-basic"
     2→description = "Code block should accumulate and emit only after closing fence"
     3→
     4→[[chunks]]
     5→input = "```"
     6→emit = ""
     7→
     8→[[chunks]]
     9→input = "rust"
    10→emit = ""
    11→
    12→[[chunks]]
    13→input = "\n"
    14→emit = ""
    15→
    16→[[chunks]]
    17→input = "fn main() {\n"
    18→emit = ""
    19→
    20→[[chunks]]
    21→input = "    println!(\"Hello\");\n"
    22→emit = ""
    23→
    24→[[chunks]]
    25→input = "}\n"
    26→emit = ""
    27→
    28→[[chunks]]
    29→input = "```\n"
    30→emit = "    \u001b[38;2;180;142;173mfn\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;143;161;179mmain\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m(\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m)\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m{\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mprintln!\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m(\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\"\u001b[38;2;163;190;140mHello\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\"\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m)\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m;\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m}\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u001b[0m\n"
    31→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Now I understand the current structure better. The key observations:

  1. In handle_ready_state, the order of checks is:
  2. Blank line
  3. HTML comment
  4. ATX heading
  5. Code fence
  6. Blockquote
  7. Horizontal rule
  8. List item
  9. Link reference definition
  10. Otherwise → paragraph

  11. For indented code blocks, I need to add the check AFTER list items but BEFORE falling through to paragraph. The reason is that lists take precedence over indented code blocks per the GFM spec.

  12. The test format expects syntax-highlighted output for code blocks. But indented code blocks don't have a language, so they won't be syntax highlighted - they'll just be plain text with 4-space indentation.

  13. Important: The code block test shows that the output is prefixed with 4 spaces for display indentation. Looking at format_code_block, it adds 4-space indentation. We should reuse this for indented code blocks.

Let me check the format_code_block function to see how it handles no language:

Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn format_code_block",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-A": 50
}
1230:    fn format_code_block(&self, lines: &[String], info: &str) -> String {
1231-        let mut output = String::new();
1232-
1233-        // Map common aliases to their syntect language names
1234-        let language = match info.to_lowercase().as_str() {
1235-            "jsx" => "javascript",
1236-            "tsx" => "typescript",
1237-            _ => info,
1238-        };
1239-
1240-        // Try to find syntax definition for the language
1241-        let syntax = self
1242-            .syntax_set
1243-            .find_syntax_by_token(language)
1244-            .unwrap_or_else(|| self.syntax_set.find_syntax_plain_text());
1245-
1246-        // Get theme from two-face's embedded themes, with fallback
1247-        let theme = Self::theme_name_to_enum(&self.theme_name)
1248-            .map(|name| self.theme_set.get(name))
1249-            .unwrap_or_else(|| self.theme_set.get(EmbeddedThemeName::Base16OceanDark));
1250-
1251-        let mut highlighter = HighlightLines::new(syntax, theme);
1252-
1253-        // Process lines and collect highlighted output
1254-        let mut highlighted_lines = Vec::new();
1255-        for line in lines {
1256-            // Add newline for proper syntax highlighting state management
1257-            let line_with_newline = format!("{}\n", line);
1258-            let ranges = highlighter
1259-                .highlight_line(&line_with_newline, &self.syntax_set)
1260-                .unwrap_or_default();
1261-            let highlighted = as_24_bit_terminal_escaped(&ranges[..], false);
1262-            // Remove the trailing newline from highlighted output
1263-            let highlighted = highlighted.trim_end_matches('\n').to_string();
1264-            highlighted_lines.push(highlighted);
1265-        }
1266-
1267-        / Each line: 4 space indent + highlighted content (no background)
1268-        for highlighted in highlighted_lines.iter() {
1269-            output.push_str("    ");
1270-            output.push_str(highlighted);
1271-            output.push('\n');
1272-        }
1273-
1274-        // Reset ANSI codes to prevent color bleeding
1275-        output.push_str("\u{001b}[0m");
1276-
1277-        // Add blank line after code block for spacing
1278-        output.push('\n');
1279-        output
1280-    }
Thinking

The format_code_block function already handles the case where no language is provided - it falls back to plain text syntax. This means I can reuse this function for indented code blocks by passing an empty string for the info.

Now let me update my plan with more accurate details and then exit plan mode.

The format_code_block function already handles empty language info by falling back to plain text. Let me update the plan with final details.

✏️ Edit wiggly-twirling-hopper.md
/Users/llimllib/.claude/plans/wiggly-twirling-hopper.md
# Plan: Implement Indented Code Blocks

## Summary

Add support for GFM indented code blocks (4+ space indentation) to the streaming parser.

## GFM Spec Requirements (Section 4.4)

1. **Start**: Line indented with 4+ spaces (after a blank line or other non-paragraph block)
2. **Content**: Literal text with 4 spaces stripped from each line
3. **End**: Non-blank line with fewer than 4 leading spaces
4. **Critical constraint**: Cannot interrupt a paragraph - requires blank line before
5. **Blank lines**: Preserved within the code block (become part of content)
6. **No info string**: Unlike fenced code blocks, no language specified

## Files to Modify

- `src/lib.rs` - Parser implementation (~10 changes)
- `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml` - New test file

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Add ParserState variant (~line 142)

```rust
InIndentedCodeBlock,
```

No additional data needed - simpler than fenced code blocks.

### 2. Add BlockBuilder variant (~line 167)

```rust
IndentedCodeBlock {
    lines: Vec<String>,
},
```

### 3. Add helper function to detect indented code line

```rust
fn is_indented_code_line(&self, line: &str) -> Option<&str> {
    // Returns the content with 4 spaces stripped, or None if not indented enough
    if line.starts_with("    ") {
        Some(&line[4..])
    } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
        Some(&line[1..])  // Tab counts as 4 spaces
    } else {
        None
    }
}
```

### 4. Modify `handle_ready_state` (~line 442)

Add detection for indented code blocks. **Important**: Must come AFTER list item detection (lists take precedence), and must NOT trigger after paragraphs without blank lines.

```rust
// After list item check, before falling through to paragraph
if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
    self.state = ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock;
    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock {
        lines: vec![content.to_string()],
    };
    return None;
}
```

### 5. Add state handler `handle_in_indented_code_block`

```rust
fn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');

    // Blank line - preserve it in the code block
    if trimmed.is_empty() || trimmed.chars().all(|c| c.is_whitespace()) {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            // Preserve blank line (strip 4 spaces if present)
            let content = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed).unwrap_or("");
            lines.push(content.to_string());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Check if still indented (4+ spaces)
    if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(content.to_string());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Not indented anymore - emit block and process this line in ready state
    let output = self.emit_current_block();
    let next_output = self.handle_ready_state(line);

    match (output, next_output) {
        (Some(o1), Some(o2)) => Some(format!("{}{}", o1, o2)),
        (Some(o), None) | (None, Some(o)) => Some(o),
        (None, None) => None,
    }
}
```

### 6. Add dispatch in `process_line` (~line 440)

```rust
ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock => self.handle_in_indented_code_block(line),
```

### 7. Add formatting in `emit_current_block` (~line 1131)

```rust
BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } => {
    // Strip trailing blank lines
    let mut lines = lines.clone();
    while lines.last().map_or(false, |l| l.is_empty()) {
        lines.pop();
    }
    Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, ""))  // Empty string = no language
}
```

### 8. Handle "cannot interrupt paragraph" rule

In `handle_in_paragraph`, indented lines should be treated as paragraph continuation, not code blocks. The current implementation already does this - indented lines without a blank line get appended to the paragraph.

### 9. Handle interaction with lists

Lists already handle indented content specially. The key is that in `handle_ready_state`, we check for list items BEFORE checking for indented code blocks. This gives lists precedence.

## Test Fixtures

Create `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml`:

```toml
name = "indented-code-basic"
description = "Basic indented code block"

[[chunks]]
input = "    code line 1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    code line 2\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "paragraph\n"
emit = "    code line 1\n    code line 2\n\nparagraph"
```

## Verification

1. Run `cargo fmt`
2. Run `cargo build` - no warnings
3. Run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings` - no errors
4. Run `cargo test` - all tests pass
5. Manual test: `echo "    hello\n    world\n\ndone" | cargo run`

## Edge Cases to Handle

1. **Tab indentation**: Tab at start of line = 4 spaces
2. **Extra indentation**: Lines with 5+ spaces keep the extra (only strip 4)
3. **Blank lines in middle**: Preserved as empty lines in output
4. **Trailing blank lines**: Should be stripped from output
5. **Cannot interrupt paragraph**: Verified by existing paragraph handler
+
# Plan: Implement Indented Code Blocks

## Summary

Add support for GFM indented code blocks (4+ space indentation) to the streaming parser.

## GFM Spec Requirements (Section 4.4)

1. **Start**: Line indented with 4+ spaces (after a blank line or other non-paragraph block)
2. **Content**: Literal text with 4 spaces stripped from each line
3. **End**: Non-blank line with fewer than 4 leading spaces
4. **Critical constraint**: Cannot interrupt a paragraph - requires blank line before
5. **Blank lines**: Preserved within the code block (become part of content)
6. **No info string**: Unlike fenced code blocks, no language specified

## Files to Modify

- `src/lib.rs` - Parser implementation
- `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml` - New test file

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Add ParserState variant (after line 142)

```rust
InIndentedCodeBlock,
```

### 2. Add BlockBuilder variant (after line 167)

```rust
IndentedCodeBlock {
    lines: Vec<String>,
},
```

### 3. Add helper function to detect indented code line

```rust
fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
    if line.starts_with("    ") {
        Some(&line[4..])
    } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
        Some(&line[1..])
    } else {
        None
    }
}
```

### 4. Modify `handle_ready_state` (line 512, after link definition check)

Add detection AFTER link definitions, BEFORE falling through to paragraph:

```rust
// Check for indented code block (4+ spaces)
// Must come after list check (lists take precedence)
if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
    self.state = ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock;
    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock {
        lines: vec![content.to_string()],
    };
    return None;
}
```

### 5. Add dispatch in `process_line` (around line 435)

```rust
ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock => self.handle_in_indented_code_block(line),
```

### 6. Add state handler `handle_in_indented_code_block`

```rust
fn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');

    // Blank line - preserve in code block
    if trimmed.is_empty() {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(String::new());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Still indented? Continue accumulating
    if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(content.to_string());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Not indented - emit block and process line in ready state
    let output = self.emit_current_block();
    let next_output = self.handle_ready_state(line);

    match (output, next_output) {
        (Some(o1), Some(o2)) => Some(format!("{}{}", o1, o2)),
        (Some(o), None) | (None, Some(o)) => Some(o),
        (None, None) => None,
    }
}
```

### 7. Add formatting in `emit_current_block` (around line 1106)

```rust
BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } => {
    let mut lines = lines.clone();
    // Strip trailing blank lines
    while lines.last().map_or(false, |l| l.is_empty()) {
        lines.pop();
    }
    Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, ""))
}
```

Note: `format_code_block` already handles empty language by using plain text syntax.

## Test File

Create `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml` with tests for:
- Basic indented code block
- Blank lines preserved within code block
- Trailing blank lines stripped
- Extra indentation preserved (5+ spaces keeps 1+)
- Tab indentation

## Verification

```bash
cargo fmt
cargo build
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
cargo test
```

Manual test:
```bash
printf "    line1\n    line2\n\ndone\n" | cargo run
```
The file /Users/llimllib/.claude/plans/wiggly-twirling-hopper.md has been updated successfully.
Thinking

The plan is complete. Let me exit plan mode so the user can review and approve it.

The plan is ready. The implementation involves:

  1. Adding a new InIndentedCodeBlock parser state and IndentedCodeBlock block builder
  2. A helper function to detect 4+ space indentation and strip it
  3. Inserting detection in handle_ready_state after list items (lists take precedence per GFM spec)
  4. A state handler that accumulates lines until a non-indented line is encountered
  5. Reusing format_code_block with empty language for output formatting
  6. Test fixtures covering basic cases and edge cases
ExitPlanMode
{
  "plan": "# Plan: Implement Indented Code Blocks\n\n## Summary\n\nAdd support for GFM indented code blocks (4+ space indentation) to the streaming parser.\n\n## GFM Spec Requirements (Section 4.4)\n\n1. **Start**: Line indented with 4+ spaces (after a blank line or other non-paragraph block)\n2. **Content**: Literal text with 4 spaces stripped from each line\n3. **End**: Non-blank line with fewer than 4 leading spaces\n4. **Critical constraint**: Cannot interrupt a paragraph - requires blank line before\n5. **Blank lines**: Preserved within the code block (become part of content)\n6. **No info string**: Unlike fenced code blocks, no language specified\n\n## Files to Modify\n\n- `src/lib.rs` - Parser implementation\n- `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml` - New test file\n\n## Implementation Steps\n\n### 1. Add ParserState variant (after line 142)\n\n```rust\nInIndentedCodeBlock,\n```\n\n### 2. Add BlockBuilder variant (after line 167)\n\n```rust\nIndentedCodeBlock {\n    lines: Vec<String>,\n},\n```\n\n### 3. Add helper function to detect indented code line\n\n```rust\nfn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {\n    if line.starts_with(\"    \") {\n        Some(&line[4..])\n    } else if line.starts_with('\\t') {\n        Some(&line[1..])\n    } else {\n        None\n    }\n}\n```\n\n### 4. Modify `handle_ready_state` (line 512, after link definition check)\n\nAdd detection AFTER link definitions, BEFORE falling through to paragraph:\n\n```rust\n// Check for indented code block (4+ spaces)\n// Must come after list check (lists take precedence)\nif let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {\n    self.state = ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock;\n    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock {\n        lines: vec![content.to_string()],\n    };\n    return None;\n}\n```\n\n### 5. Add dispatch in `process_line` (around line 435)\n\n```rust\nParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock => self.handle_in_indented_code_block(line),\n```\n\n### 6. Add state handler `handle_in_indented_code_block`\n\n```rust\nfn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {\n    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\\n');\n\n    // Blank line - preserve in code block\n    if trimmed.is_empty() {\n        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {\n            lines.push(String::new());\n        }\n        return None;\n    }\n\n    // Still indented? Continue accumulating\n    if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {\n        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {\n            lines.push(content.to_string());\n        }\n        return None;\n    }\n\n    // Not indented - emit block and process line in ready state\n    let output = self.emit_current_block();\n    let next_output = self.handle_ready_state(line);\n\n    match (output, next_output) {\n        (Some(o1), Some(o2)) => Some(format!(\"{}{}\", o1, o2)),\n        (Some(o), None) | (None, Some(o)) => Some(o),\n        (None, None) => None,\n    }\n}\n```\n\n### 7. Add formatting in `emit_current_block` (around line 1106)\n\n```rust\nBlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } => {\n    let mut lines = lines.clone();\n    // Strip trailing blank lines\n    while lines.last().map_or(false, |l| l.is_empty()) {\n        lines.pop();\n    }\n    Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, \"\"))\n}\n```\n\nNote: `format_code_block` already handles empty language by using plain text syntax.\n\n## Test File\n\nCreate `tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml` with tests for:\n- Basic indented code block\n- Blank lines preserved within code block\n- Trailing blank lines stripped\n- Extra indentation preserved (5+ spaces keeps 1+)\n- Tab indentation\n\n## Verification\n\n```bash\ncargo fmt\ncargo build\ncargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings\ncargo test\n```\n\nManual test:\n```bash\nprintf \"    line1\\n    line2\\n\\ndone\\n\" | cargo run\n```\n"
}
The user doesn't want to proceed with this tool use. The tool use was rejected (eg. if it was a file edit, the new_string was NOT written to the file). STOP what you are doing and wait for the user to tell you how to proceed.

[Request interrupted by user for tool use]

Implement the following plan:

Plan: Implement Indented Code Blocks

Summary

Add support for GFM indented code blocks (4+ space indentation) to the streaming parser.

GFM Spec Requirements (Section 4.4)

  1. Start: Line indented with 4+ spaces (after a blank line or other non-paragraph block)
  2. Content: Literal text with 4 spaces stripped from each line
  3. End: Non-blank line with fewer than 4 leading spaces
  4. Critical constraint: Cannot interrupt a paragraph - requires blank line before
  5. Blank lines: Preserved within the code block (become part of content)
  6. No info string: Unlike fenced code blocks, no language specified

Files to Modify

  • src/lib.rs - Parser implementation
  • tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml - New test file

Implementation Steps

1. Add ParserState variant (after line 142)

InIndentedCodeBlock,

2. Add BlockBuilder variant (after line 167)

IndentedCodeBlock {
    lines: Vec<String>,
},

3. Add helper function to detect indented code line

fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
    if line.starts_with("    ") {
        Some(&line[4..])
    } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
        Some(&line[1..])
    } else {
        None
    }
}

4. Modify handle_ready_state (line 512, after link definition check)

Add detection AFTER link definitions, BEFORE falling through to paragraph:

// Check for indented code block (4+ spaces)
// Must come after list check (lists take precedence)
if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
    self.state = ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock;
    self.current_block = BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock {
        lines: vec![content.to_string()],
    };
    return None;
}

5. Add dispatch in process_line (around line 435)

ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock => self.handle_in_indented_code_block(line),

6. Add state handler handle_in_indented_code_block

fn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');

    // Blank line - preserve in code block
    if trimmed.is_empty() {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(String::new());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Still indented? Continue accumulating
    if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(content.to_string());
        }
        return None;
    }

    // Not indented - emit block and process line in ready state
    let output = self.emit_current_block();
    let next_output = self.handle_ready_state(line);

    match (output, next_output) {
        (Some(o1), Some(o2)) => Some(format!("{}{}", o1, o2)),
        (Some(o), None) | (None, Some(o)) => Some(o),
        (None, None) => None,
    }
}

7. Add formatting in emit_current_block (around line 1106)

BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } => {
    let mut lines = lines.clone();
    // Strip trailing blank lines
    while lines.last().map_or(false, |l| l.is_empty()) {
        lines.pop();
    }
    Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, ""))
}

Note: format_code_block already handles empty language by using plain text syntax.

Test File

Create tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml with tests for: - Basic indented code block - Blank lines preserved within code block - Trailing blank lines stripped - Extra indentation preserved (5+ spaces keeps 1+) - Tab indentation

Verification

cargo fmt
cargo build
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
cargo test

Manual test:

printf "    line1\n    line2\n\ndone\n" | cargo run

If you need specific details from before exiting plan mode (like exact code snippets, error messages, or content you generated), read the full transcript at: /Users/llimllib/.claude/projects/-Users-llimllib-code-mdriver-features/73b270af-910b-476e-8b81-eecf0d5b4fd7.jsonl

Thinking

The user wants me to implement indented code blocks according to the plan they've provided. Let me start by reading the relevant files to understand the current state of the codebase, then implement the changes step by step.

Let me first read the main source file to understand the current parser implementation.

I'll implement indented code blocks according to the plan. Let me start by reading the current implementation.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs"
}
File content (28970 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (25000). Please use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or use the GrepTool to search for specific content.
Thinking

The file is large, so I'll need to read it in parts. Let me start by reading the beginning portion to see the structure.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 1,
  "limit": 200
}
     1→use std::cell::RefCell;
     2→use std::collections::HashMap;
     3→use std::sync::LazyLock;
     4→
     5→use syntect::easy::HighlightLines;
     6→use syntect::parsing::SyntaxSet;
     7→use syntect::util::as_24_bit_terminal_escaped;
     8→use two_face::theme::{EmbeddedLazyThemeSet, EmbeddedThemeName};
     9→use unicode_width::UnicodeWidthStr;
    10→
    11→// Static theme set using two-face's extended themes
    12→static THEME_SET: LazyLock<EmbeddedLazyThemeSet> = LazyLock::new(two_face::theme::extra);
    13→
    14→// HTML entity lookup table
    15→static HTML_ENTITIES: LazyLock<HashMap<&'static str, char>> = LazyLock::new(|| {
    16→    let mut m = HashMap::new();
    17→    // Essential (XML) entities
    18→    m.insert("amp", '&');
    19→    m.insert("lt", '<');
    20→    m.insert("gt", '>');
    21→    m.insert("quot", '"');
    22→    m.insert("apos", '\'');
    23→    // Whitespace
    24→    m.insert("nbsp", '\u{00A0}');
    25→    // Typographic
    26→    m.insert("ndash", '–');
    27→    m.insert("mdash", '—');
    28→    m.insert("hellip", '…');
    29→    m.insert("lsquo", '\u{2018}'); // '
    30→    m.insert("rsquo", '\u{2019}'); // '
    31→    m.insert("ldquo", '\u{201C}'); // "
    32→    m.insert("rdquo", '\u{201D}'); // "
    33→    m.insert("bull", '•');
    34→    m.insert("middot", '·');
    35→    // Symbols
    36→    m.insert("copy", '©');
    37→    m.insert("reg", '®');
    38→    m.insert("trade", '™');
    39→    m.insert("deg", '°');
    40→    m.insert("plusmn", '±');
    41→    m.insert("times", '×');
    42→    m.insert("divide", '÷');
    43→    // Fractions
    44→    m.insert("frac14", '¼');
    45→    m.insert("frac12", '½');
    46→    m.insert("frac34", '¾');
    47→    // Currency
    48→    m.insert("cent", '¢');
    49→    m.insert("pound", '£');
    50→    m.insert("euro", '€');
    51→    m.insert("yen", '¥');
    52→    // Arrows
    53→    m.insert("larr", '←');
    54→    m.insert("rarr", '→');
    55→    m.insert("uarr", '↑');
    56→    m.insert("darr", '↓');
    57→    m
    58→});
    59→
    60→/// Column alignment in tables
    61→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    62→enum Alignment {
    63→    Left,
    64→    Center,
    65→    Right,
    66→}
    67→
    68→/// List item type
    69→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    70→enum ListItemType {
    71→    Unordered,
    72→    Ordered,
    73→}
    74→
    75→/// Callout type for GitHub-style alerts
    76→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    77→enum CalloutType {
    78→    Note,
    79→    Tip,
    80→    Important,
    81→    Warning,
    82→    Caution,
    83→}
    84→
    85→/// Image protocol for rendering images
    86→#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
    87→pub enum ImageProtocol {
    88→    None,
    89→    Kitty,
    90→}
    91→
    92→/// Image data parsed from markdown
    93→#[derive(Debug)]
    94→struct ImageData {
    95→    alt: String,
    96→    src: String,
    97→    end_pos: usize,
    98→}
    99→
   100→/// Streaming markdown parser that emits formatted blocks incrementally
   101→pub struct StreamingParser {
   102→    buffer: String,
   103→    state: ParserState,
   104→    current_block: BlockBuilder,
   105→    syntax_set: SyntaxSet,
   106→    theme_set: &'static EmbeddedLazyThemeSet,
   107→    theme_name: String,
   108→    image_protocol: ImageProtocol,
   109→    width: usize,
   110→    /// Cache for prefetched image data (URL -> image bytes)
   111→    image_cache: HashMap<String, Vec<u8>>,
   112→    /// Link reference definitions: normalized_label -> (url, optional_title)
   113→    link_definitions: HashMap<String, (String, Option<String>)>,
   114→    /// Pending citations for bibliography: (citation_number, label, display_text)
   115→    pending_citations: RefCell<Vec<(usize, String, String)>>,
   116→    /// Next citation number to assign
   117→    next_citation_number: RefCell<usize>,
   118→}
   119→
   120→/// Calculate the default output width: min(terminal_width, 80)
   121→fn default_width() -> usize {
   122→    term_size::dimensions()
   123→        .map(|(w, _)| w.min(80))
   124→        .unwrap_or(80)
   125→}
   126→
   127→#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
   128→enum ParserState {
   129→    Ready,
   130→    InParagraph,
   131→    InCodeBlock {
   132→        info: String,
   133→        fence: String,
   134→        indent_offset: usize,
   135→    },
   136→    InList,
   137→    InListAfterBlank, // In a list but just saw a blank line
   138→    InTable,
   139→    InBlockquote {
   140→        nesting_level: usize,
   141→    },
   142→}
   143→
   144→#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
   145→enum BlockBuilder {
   146→    None,
   147→    Paragraph {
   148→        lines: Vec<String>,
   149→    },
   150→    CodeBlock {
   151→        lines: Vec<String>,
   152→        #[allow(dead_code)]
   153→        info: String, // Language info for future syntax highlighting
   154→    },
   155→    List {
   156→        items: Vec<(usize, ListItemType, String)>, // (indentation_level, type, content)
   157→    },
   158→    Table {
   159→        header: Vec<String>,
   160→        alignments: Vec<Alignment>,
   161→        rows: Vec<Vec<String>>,
   162→    },
   163→    Blockquote {
   164→        lines: Vec<(usize, String)>,
   165→        current_nesting: usize,
   166→    },
   167→}
   168→
   169→struct LinkData {
   170→    text: String,
   171→    url: String,
   172→    end_pos: usize,
   173→}
   174→
   175→/// Result from parsing a reference-style link
   176→struct ReferenceLinkData {
   177→    /// The link text (what to display)
   178→    text: String,
   179→    /// The reference label (for lookup, not necessarily same as text)
   180→    label: String,
   181→    /// Position after the link syntax
   182→    end_pos: usize,
   183→}
   184→
   185→/// Result from parsing an HTML tag
   186→struct HtmlTagResult {
   187→    formatted: String,
   188→    end_pos: usize,
   189→}
   190→
   191→impl StreamingParser {
   192→    pub fn new() -> Self {
   193→        Self::with_theme("base16-ocean.dark", ImageProtocol::None)
   194→    }
   195→
   196→    /// Create a new parser with a specific syntax highlighting theme
   197→    pub fn with_theme(theme_name: &str, image_protocol: ImageProtocol) -> Self {
   198→        Self {
   199→            buffer: String::new(),
   200→            state: ParserState::Ready,

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Good, I can see the ParserState and BlockBuilder enums. Let me continue reading to see more of the implementation, especially the process_line function and handle_ready_state.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn process_line",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn handle_ready_state",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn emit_current_block",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
1106:    fn emit_current_block(&mut self) -> Option<String> {
442:    fn handle_ready_state(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
430:    fn process_line(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
Thinking

Now let me read the process_line function and handle_ready_state to understand the pattern.

Let me read the relevant sections.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 430,
  "limit": 200
}
   430→    fn process_line(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   431→        match &self.state {
   432→            ParserState::Ready => self.handle_ready_state(line),
   433→            ParserState::InParagraph => self.handle_in_paragraph(line),
   434→            ParserState::InCodeBlock { .. } => self.handle_in_code_block(line),
   435→            ParserState::InList => self.handle_in_list(line),
   436→            ParserState::InListAfterBlank => self.handle_in_list_after_blank(line),
   437→            ParserState::InTable => self.handle_in_table(line),
   438→            ParserState::InBlockquote { .. } => self.handle_in_blockquote(line),
   439→        }
   440→    }
   441→
   442→    fn handle_ready_state(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   443→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   444→
   445→        // Check for blank line
   446→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   447→            return None;
   448→        }
   449→
   450→        // Check for HTML comment line (<!-- ... -->)
   451→        // These should be silently skipped
   452→        if self.is_html_comment_line(trimmed) {
   453→            return None;
   454→        }
   455→
   456→        // Check for ATX heading (# )
   457→        if let Some(level) = self.parse_atx_heading(trimmed) {
   458→            let text = trimmed[level..].trim_start().to_string();
   459→            // Headings complete on the same line - emit immediately
   460→            return Some(self.format_heading(level, &text));
   461→        }
   462→
   463→        // Check for code fence (```)
   464→        if let Some((info, fence, indent_offset)) = self.parse_code_fence(trimmed) {
   465→            self.state = ParserState::InCodeBlock {
   466→                info: info.clone(),
   467→                fence: fence.clone(),
   468→                indent_offset,
   469→            };
   470→            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::CodeBlock {
   471→                lines: Vec::new(),
   472→                info,
   473→            };
   474→            return None;
   475→        }
   476→
   477→        // Check for blockquote
   478→        if let Some(nesting_level) = self.parse_blockquote_marker(trimmed) {
   479→            let content = self.strip_blockquote_markers(trimmed, nesting_level);
   480→            self.state = ParserState::InBlockquote { nesting_level };
   481→            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
   482→                lines: vec![(nesting_level, content)],
   483→                current_nesting: nesting_level,
   484→            };
   485→            return None;
   486→        }
   487→
   488→        // Check for horizontal rule (thematic break)
   489→        // Must be checked before list items per GFM spec
   490→        if self.is_horizontal_rule(trimmed) {
   491→            return Some(self.format_horizontal_rule());
   492→        }
   493→
   494→        // Check for list item (- or digit.)
   495→        if let Some((indent, item_type)) = self.parse_list_item(trimmed) {
   496→            self.state = ParserState::InList;
   497→            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::List {
   498→                items: vec![(indent, item_type, trimmed.to_string())],
   499→            };
   500→            return None;
   501→        }
   502→
   503→        // Check for link reference definition [label]: url "title"
   504→        // These are stored but never emit content
   505→        if let Some((label, url, title)) = self.parse_link_definition(trimmed) {
   506→            let normalized_label = self.normalize_link_label(&label);
   507→            // First definition wins (don't overwrite)
   508→            self.link_definitions
   509→                .entry(normalized_label)
   510→                .or_insert((url, title));
   511→            return None;
   512→        }
   513→
   514→        // Otherwise, start a paragraph
   515→        self.state = ParserState::InParagraph;
   516→        self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Paragraph {
   517→            lines: vec![trimmed.to_string()],
   518→        };
   519→        None
   520→    }
   521→
   522→    fn handle_in_paragraph(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   523→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   524→
   525→        // Blank line completes paragraph
   526→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   527→            return self.emit_current_block();
   528→        }
   529→
   530→        // Check if this is a setext heading underline
   531→        if let Some(level) = self.parse_setext_underline(trimmed) {
   532→            if let BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } = &self.current_block {
   533→                // Join all lines to form the heading text
   534→                let text = lines.join(" ");
   535→                self.state = ParserState::Ready;
   536→                self.current_block = BlockBuilder::None;
   537→                return Some(self.format_heading(level, &text));
   538→            }
   539→        }
   540→
   541→        // Check if this might be a table delimiter row
   542→        if let BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } = &self.current_block {
   543→            if lines.len() == 1 && self.is_table_delimiter_row(trimmed) {
   544→                // Extract header cells from first line
   545→                let header = self.parse_table_row(&lines[0]);
   546→                let alignments = self.parse_alignments(trimmed);
   547→
   548→                // Promote to table
   549→                self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Table {
   550→                    header,
   551→                    alignments,
   552→                    rows: Vec::new(),
   553→                };
   554→                self.state = ParserState::InTable;
   555→                return None; // No emission yet
   556→            }
   557→        }
   558→
   559→        // Add line to paragraph
   560→        if let BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
   561→            lines.push(trimmed.to_string());
   562→        }
   563→        None
   564→    }
   565→
   566→    fn handle_in_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   567→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   568→
   569→        // Check if this is the closing fence
   570→        if let ParserState::InCodeBlock {
   571→            fence,
   572→            indent_offset,
   573→            ..
   574→        } = &self.state
   575→        {
   576→            // Closing fence can have 0-3 spaces of indentation (normal case)
   577→            // or 4+ spaces (when inside a list item)
   578→            let line_trimmed = trimmed.trim_start();
   579→
   580→            // Check if this line is just the fence (possibly with trailing spaces)
   581→            if line_trimmed.starts_with(fence) && line_trimmed.trim() == fence.trim() {
   582→                // Closing fence - emit the block
   583→                return self.emit_current_block();
   584→            }
   585→
   586→            // Add line to code block, stripping the indent offset
   587→            if let BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { lines, .. } = &mut self.current_block {
   588→                // Strip indent_offset spaces from the beginning if present
   589→                let line_to_add = if *indent_offset > 0 && trimmed.len() >= *indent_offset {
   590→                    &trimmed[*indent_offset..]
   591→                } else {
   592→                    trimmed
   593→                };
   594→                lines.push(line_to_add.to_string());
   595→            }
   596→        }
   597→
   598→        None
   599→    }
   600→
   601→    fn handle_in_list(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   602→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   603→
   604→        // Blank lines can appear within multi-paragraph list items
   605→        // Transition to InListAfterBlank to check if list continues
   606→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   607→            self.state = ParserState::InListAfterBlank;
   608→            return None;
   609→        }
   610→
   611→        // Check for horizontal rule (takes precedence over list items per GFM spec)
   612→        if self.is_horizontal_rule(trimmed) {
   613→            let emission = self.emit_current_block();
   614→            let hr = self.format_horizontal_rule();
   615→            return match emission {
   616→                Some(e) => Some(format!("{}{}", e, hr)),
   617→                None => Some(hr),
   618→            };
   619→        }
   620→
   621→        // Check if it's another list item
   622→        if let Some((indent, item_type)) = self.parse_list_item(trimmed) {
   623→            if let BlockBuilder::List { items } = &mut self.current_block {
   624→                items.push((indent, item_type, trimmed.to_string()));
   625→            }
   626→            return None;
   627→        }
   628→
   629→        // Check if this is indented content (4+ spaces) - could be list continuation or code fence

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Good, I'm getting a picture of the code structure. Let me now read the emit_current_block function to see how blocks are emitted.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 1106,
  "limit": 100
}
  1106→    fn emit_current_block(&mut self) -> Option<String> {
  1107→        let block = std::mem::replace(&mut self.current_block, BlockBuilder::None);
  1108→        self.state = ParserState::Ready;
  1109→
  1110→        // If images are enabled, prefetch all images in the block in parallel
  1111→        if self.image_protocol != ImageProtocol::None {
  1112→            let block_text = self.extract_block_text(&block);
  1113→            let urls = self.extract_image_urls(&block_text);
  1114→            if !urls.is_empty() {
  1115→                self.prefetch_images(&urls);
  1116→            }
  1117→        }
  1118→
  1119→        match block {
  1120→            BlockBuilder::None => None,
  1121→            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => Some(self.format_paragraph(&lines)),
  1122→            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { lines, info } => Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, &info)),
  1123→            BlockBuilder::List { items } => Some(self.format_list(&items)),
  1124→            BlockBuilder::Table {
  1125→                header,
  1126→                alignments,
  1127→                rows,
  1128→            } => Some(self.format_table(&header, &alignments, &rows)),
  1129→            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => Some(self.format_blockquote(&lines)),
  1130→        }
  1131→    }
  1132→
  1133→    /// Extract all text content from a block for image URL scanning
  1134→    fn extract_block_text(&self, block: &BlockBuilder) -> String {
  1135→        match block {
  1136→            BlockBuilder::None => String::new(),
  1137→            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => lines.join("\n"),
  1138→            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { .. } => String::new(), // Code blocks don't have images
  1139→            BlockBuilder::List { items } => items
  1140→                .iter()
  1141→                .map(|(_, _, s)| s.as_str())
  1142→                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
  1143→                .join("\n"),
  1144→            BlockBuilder::Table { header, rows, .. } => {
  1145→                let mut text = header.join("\n");
  1146→                for row in rows {
  1147→                    text.push('\n');
  1148→                    text.push_str(&row.join("\n"));
  1149→                }
  1150→                text
  1151→            }
  1152→            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => lines
  1153→                .iter()
  1154→                .map(|(_, s)| s.as_str())
  1155→                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
  1156→                .join("\n"),
  1157→        }
  1158→    }
  1159→
  1160→    fn format_heading(&self, level: usize, text: &str) -> String {
  1161→        let formatted_text = self.format_inline(text);
  1162→        // Heading: blue and bold, with line break after for spacing
  1163→        // Replace any ANSI reset codes within the formatted text to restore heading style
  1164→        // This prevents inline formatting (like _italic_) from breaking the heading color
  1165→        let heading_style = "\u{001b}[1;34m";
  1166→        let formatted_text =
  1167→            formatted_text.replace("\u{001b}[0m", &format!("\u{001b}[0m{}", heading_style));
  1168→        format!(
  1169→            "{}{} {}\u{001b}[0m\n\n",
  1170→            heading_style,
  1171→            "#".repeat(level),
  1172→            formatted_text
  1173→        )
  1174→    }
  1175→
  1176→    fn format_horizontal_rule(&self) -> String {
  1177→        // Use a line of dashes with dim/gray color
  1178→        let rule = "─".repeat(self.width);
  1179→        format!("\u{001b}[2m{}\u{001b}[0m\n\n", rule)
  1180→    }
  1181→
  1182→    fn format_paragraph(&self, lines: &[String]) -> String {
  1183→        let mut result = String::new();
  1184→
  1185→        for (i, line) in lines.iter().enumerate() {
  1186→            // Check for hard line break: 2+ trailing spaces or trailing backslash
  1187→            let has_hard_break = line.ends_with("  ")
  1188→                || line.ends_with("   ")
  1189→                || line.ends_with("    ")
  1190→                || line.ends_with('\\');
  1191→
  1192→            // Remove trailing spaces/backslash for formatting
  1193→            let trimmed = if line.ends_with('\\') {
  1194→                &line[..line.len() - 1]
  1195→            } else {
  1196→                line.trim_end()
  1197→            };
  1198→
  1199→            result.push_str(trimmed);
  1200→
  1201→            // Add line break or space depending on hard break
  1202→            if has_hard_break && i < lines.len() - 1 {
  1203→                result.push('\n');
  1204→            } else if i < lines.len() - 1 {
  1205→                result.push(' ');

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Now let me look at the format_code_block function to understand how code blocks are formatted. This will help me format indented code blocks.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn format_code_block",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
1230:    fn format_code_block(&self, lines: &[String], info: &str) -> String {
Thinking

Now let me create the task list and start implementing the changes.

TaskCreate
Add the InIndentedCodeBlock variant to the ParserState enum after line 142
{
  "subject": "Add InIndentedCodeBlock variant to ParserState",
  "activeForm": "Adding ParserState variant"
}
TaskCreate
Add the IndentedCodeBlock { lines: Vec<String> } variant to the BlockBuilder enum after line 167
{
  "subject": "Add IndentedCodeBlock variant to BlockBuilder",
  "activeForm": "Adding BlockBuilder variant"
}
TaskCreate
Add a helper function to detect if a line is indented with 4+ spaces or a tab, returning the content without the indentation
{
  "subject": "Add is_indented_code_line helper function",
  "activeForm": "Adding helper function"
}
TaskCreate
Modify handle_ready_state to detect indented code blocks after link definitions, before falling through to paragraph
{
  "subject": "Add indented code detection to handle_ready_state",
  "activeForm": "Modifying handle_ready_state"
}
TaskCreate
Add the case to process_line that dispatches to handle_in_indented_code_block
{
  "subject": "Add dispatch in process_line for InIndentedCodeBlock",
  "activeForm": "Adding dispatch case"
}
TaskCreate
Add the state handler that accumulates lines, handles blank lines, and emits the block when a non-indented line is encountered
{
  "subject": "Implement handle_in_indented_code_block handler",
  "activeForm": "Implementing state handler"
}
TaskCreate
Add handling for IndentedCodeBlock in emit_current_block, using format_code_block with empty info string
{
  "subject": "Add IndentedCodeBlock case to emit_current_block",
  "activeForm": "Adding emit case"
}
TaskCreate
Create tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml with tests for basic indented code, blank lines preservation, trailing blank line stripping, extra indentation preservation, and tab indentation
{
  "subject": "Create test file for indented code blocks",
  "activeForm": "Creating test file"
}
TaskCreate
Run cargo fmt, cargo build, cargo clippy, and cargo test to verify the implementation
{
  "subject": "Run verification commands",
  "activeForm": "Running verification"
}
Task #1 created successfully: Add InIndentedCodeBlock variant to ParserState
Task #2 created successfully: Add IndentedCodeBlock variant to BlockBuilder
Task #3 created successfully: Add is_indented_code_line helper function
Task #4 created successfully: Add indented code detection to handle_ready_state
Task #5 created successfully: Add dispatch in process_line for InIndentedCodeBlock
Task #6 created successfully: Implement handle_in_indented_code_block handler
Task #7 created successfully: Add IndentedCodeBlock case to emit_current_block
Task #8 created successfully: Create test file for indented code blocks
Task #9 created successfully: Run verification commands
Thinking

Now let me start with task 1 - adding the InIndentedCodeBlock variant to ParserState.

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "1",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #1 status
Thinking

Now let me add the InIndentedCodeBlock variant. I need to find the exact location in the ParserState enum. From the earlier read, I see the enum ends at line 142.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
    InBlockquote {
        nesting_level: usize,
    },
}
+
    InBlockquote {
        nesting_level: usize,
    },
    InIndentedCodeBlock,
}
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Good. Now let me mark task 1 as completed and start task 2 to add the BlockBuilder variant.

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "1",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "2",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #1 status
Updated task #2 status
Thinking

Expected - we need to add the missing arm in process_line. But first let me add the BlockBuilder variant.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
    Blockquote {
        lines: Vec<(usize, String)>,
        current_nesting: usize,
    },
}
+
    Blockquote {
        lines: Vec<(usize, String)>,
        current_nesting: usize,
    },
    IndentedCodeBlock {
        lines: Vec<String>,
    },
}
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Good. Now let me mark task 2 as completed and move on to task 3 to add the helper function. But first I should also add task 5 (the dispatch) and task 7 (emit_current_block) since they're all related.

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "2",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "3",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #2 status
Updated task #3 status
Thinking

Good, these are expected. Let me now add the helper function. I need to find a good place to put it. Let me first read the area where similar helper functions are located.

Let me find where similar helper functions are defined.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn parse_atx_heading",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
794:    fn parse_atx_heading(&self, line: &str) -> Option<usize> {
Thinking

Let me read that area to understand the pattern for helper functions.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 790,
  "limit": 80
}
   790→
   791→        None
   792→    }
   793→
   794→    fn parse_atx_heading(&self, line: &str) -> Option<usize> {
   795→        let mut level = 0;
   796→        for ch in line.chars() {
   797→            if ch == '#' {
   798→                level += 1;
   799→                if level > 6 {
   800→                    return None;
   801→                }
   802→            } else if ch == ' ' && level > 0 {
   803→                return Some(level);
   804→            } else {
   805→                return None;
   806→            }
   807→        }
   808→        None
   809→    }
   810→
   811→    fn parse_setext_underline(&self, line: &str) -> Option<usize> {
   812→        // Setext underline: 0-3 spaces, then sequence of = or -, with trailing spaces allowed
   813→        let leading_spaces = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
   814→
   815→        if leading_spaces > 3 {
   816→            return None;
   817→        }
   818→
   819→        let trimmed = line.trim();
   820→
   821→        // Check for all = (level 1)
   822→        if !trimmed.is_empty() && trimmed.chars().all(|c| c == '=') {
   823→            return Some(1);
   824→        }
   825→
   826→        // Check for all - (level 2)
   827→        if !trimmed.is_empty() && trimmed.chars().all(|c| c == '-') {
   828→            return Some(2);
   829→        }
   830→
   831→        None
   832→    }
   833→
   834→    /// Check if a line is entirely an HTML comment (<!-- ... -->)
   835→    fn is_html_comment_line(&self, line: &str) -> bool {
   836→        let trimmed = line.trim();
   837→        if !trimmed.starts_with("<!--") {
   838→            return false;
   839→        }
   840→        if !trimmed.ends_with("-->") {
   841→            return false;
   842→        }
   843→        // Ensure the comment is properly formed (has content or is empty)
   844→        // and doesn't have an early --> before the final one
   845→        let inner = &trimmed[4..trimmed.len() - 3];
   846→        // Make sure there's no --> in the middle (which would mean malformed)
   847→        !inner.contains("-->")
   848→    }
   849→
   850→    fn is_horizontal_rule(&self, line: &str) -> bool {
   851→        // Horizontal rule: 0-3 spaces, then 3+ matching -, _, or * chars
   852→        // with optional spaces/tabs between them
   853→        let leading_spaces = line.len() - line.trim_start().len();
   854→
   855→        if leading_spaces > 3 {
   856→            return false;
   857→        }
   858→
   859→        let trimmed = line.trim();
   860→
   861→        // Count matching characters
   862→        let mut rule_char: Option<char> = None;
   863→        let mut count = 0;
   864→
   865→        for ch in trimmed.chars() {
   866→            match ch {
   867→                '-' | '_' | '*' => {
   868→                    if let Some(rc) = rule_char {
   869→                        if rc != ch {

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Good, I can see the pattern. The helper functions are defined in this area. I'll add my is_indented_code_line function near the other parsing helper functions. Let me add it after is_html_comment_line.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
    /// Check if a line is entirely an HTML comment (<!-- ... -->)
    fn is_html_comment_line(&self, line: &str) -> bool {
        let trimmed = line.trim();
        if !trimmed.starts_with("<!--") {
            return false;
        }
        if !trimmed.ends_with("-->") {
            return false;
        }
        // Ensure the comment is properly formed (has content or is empty)
        // and doesn't have an early --> before the final one
        let inner = &trimmed[4..trimmed.len() - 3];
        // Make sure there's no --> in the middle (which would mean malformed)
        !inner.contains("-->")
    }

    fn is_horizontal_rule
+
    /// Check if a line is entirely an HTML comment (<!-- ... -->)
    fn is_html_comment_line(&self, line: &str) -> bool {
        let trimmed = line.trim();
        if !trimmed.starts_with("<!--") {
            return false;
        }
        if !trimmed.ends_with("-->") {
            return false;
        }
        // Ensure the comment is properly formed (has content or is empty)
        // and doesn't have an early --> before the final one
        let inner = &trimmed[4..trimmed.len() - 3];
        // Make sure there's no --> in the middle (which would mean malformed)
        !inner.contains("-->")
    }

    /// Check if a line is indented code (4+ spaces or tab), return content with indentation stripped
    fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
        if line.starts_with("    ") {
            Some(&line[4..])
        } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
            Some(&line[1..])
        } else {
            None
        }
    }

    fn is_horizontal_rule
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Good. Now let me mark task 3 as completed and move on to task 5 - adding the dispatch in process_line.

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "3",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "5",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #3 status
Updated task #5 status
Thinking

Good, the warnings have changed. Now let me add the dispatch in process_line. Let me read the exact area.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 430,
  "limit": 20
}
   430→        output.push('\n');
   431→        Some(output)
   432→    }
   433→
   434→    fn process_line(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   435→        match &self.state {
   436→            ParserState::Ready => self.handle_ready_state(line),
   437→            ParserState::InParagraph => self.handle_in_paragraph(line),
   438→            ParserState::InCodeBlock { .. } => self.handle_in_code_block(line),
   439→            ParserState::InList => self.handle_in_list(line),
   440→            ParserState::InListAfterBlank => self.handle_in_list_after_blank(line),
   441→            ParserState::InTable => self.handle_in_table(line),
   442→            ParserState::InBlockquote { .. } => self.handle_in_blockquote(line),
   443→        }
   444→    }
   445→
   446→    fn handle_ready_state(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   447→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   448→
   449→        // Check for blank line

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Good, now I can add the dispatch for InIndentedCodeBlock.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
    fn process_line(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
        match &self.state {
            ParserState::Ready => self.handle_ready_state(line),
            ParserState::InParagraph => self.handle_in_paragraph(line),
            ParserState::InCodeBlock { .. } => self.handle_in_code_block(line),
            ParserState::InList => self.handle_in_list(line),
            ParserState::InListAfterBlank => self.handle_in_list_after_blank(line),
            ParserState::InTable => self.handle_in_table(line),
            ParserState::InBlockquote { .. } => self.handle_in_blockquote(line),
        }
    }
+
    fn process_line(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
        match &self.state {
            ParserState::Ready => self.handle_ready_state(line),
            ParserState::InParagraph => self.handle_in_paragraph(line),
            ParserState::InCodeBlock { .. } => self.handle_in_code_block(line),
            ParserState::InList => self.handle_in_list(line),
            ParserState::InListAfterBlank => self.handle_in_list_after_blank(line),
            ParserState::InTable => self.handle_in_table(line),
            ParserState::InBlockquote { .. } => self.handle_in_blockquote(line),
            ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock => self.handle_in_indented_code_block(line),
        }
    }
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Good. Now let me mark task 5 as completed and add the handler function. Let me first find where to add it (after handle_in_blockquote).

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "5",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "6",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #5 status
Updated task #6 status
Thinking

Now I need to add the handler function. Let me find where handle_in_blockquote ends.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn handle_in_blockquote",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
751:    fn handle_in_blockquote(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
Thinking

Let me read handle_in_blockquote to find where it ends so I can add the new function after it.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 751,
  "limit": 60
}
   751→    fn handle_in_blockquote(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   752→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   753→
   754→        // Blank line terminates
   755→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   756→            return self.emit_current_block();
   757→        }
   758→
   759→        // Check if line has blockquote marker
   760→        if let Some(nesting_level) = self.parse_blockquote_marker(trimmed) {
   761→            let content = self.strip_blockquote_markers(trimmed, nesting_level);
   762→
   763→            if let BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
   764→                lines,
   765→                current_nesting,
   766→            } = &mut self.current_block
   767→            {
   768→                // Update state nesting
   769→                if let ParserState::InBlockquote {
   770→                    nesting_level: ref mut state_nesting,
   771→                } = &mut self.state
   772→                {
   773→                    *state_nesting = nesting_level;
   774→                }
   775→
   776→                lines.push((nesting_level, content));
   777→                *current_nesting = nesting_level;
   778→            }
   779→            return None;
   780→        }
   781→
   782→        // Lazy continuation: line without '>' continues at current nesting
   783→        if let BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
   784→            lines,
   785→            current_nesting,
   786→        } = &mut self.current_block
   787→        {
   788→            lines.push((*current_nesting, trimmed.to_string()));
   789→            return None;
   790→        }
   791→
   792→        None
   793→    }
   794→
   795→    fn parse_atx_heading(&self, line: &str) -> Option<usize> {
   796→        let mut level = 0;
   797→        for ch in line.chars() {
   798→            if ch == '#' {
   799→                level += 1;
   800→                if level > 6 {
   801→                    return None;
   802→                }
   803→            } else if ch == ' ' && level > 0 {
   804→                return Some(level);
   805→            } else {
   806→                return None;
   807→            }
   808→        }
   809→        None
   810→    }

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Now I'll add the handle_in_indented_code_block function after handle_in_blockquote (line 793) and before parse_atx_heading (line 795).

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
        None
    }

    fn parse_atx_heading(&self, line: &str) -> Option<usize> {
        let mut level = 0;
        for ch in line.chars() {
            if ch == '#' {
                level += 1;
                if level > 6 {
                    return None;
                }
            } else if ch == ' ' && level > 0 {
                return Some(level);
            } else {
                return None;
            }
        }
        None
    }
+
        None
    }

    fn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');

        // Blank line - preserve in code block
        if trimmed.is_empty() {
            if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
                lines.push(String::new());
            }
            return None;
        }

        // Still indented? Continue accumulating
        if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
            if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
                lines.push(content.to_string());
            }
            return None;
        }

        // Not indented - emit block and process line in ready state
        let output = self.emit_current_block();
        let next_output = self.handle_ready_state(line);

        match (output, next_output) {
            (Some(o1), Some(o2)) => Some(format!("{}{}", o1, o2)),
            (Some(o), None) | (None, Some(o)) => Some(o),
            (None, None) => None,
        }
    }

    fn parse_atx_heading(&self, line: &str) -> Option<usize> {
        let mut level = 0;
        for ch in line.chars() {
            if ch == '#' {
                level += 1;
                if level > 6 {
                    return None;
                }
            } else if ch == ' ' && level > 0 {
                return Some(level);
            } else {
                return None;
            }
        }
        None
    }
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Good. Now I need to mark task 6 as completed and then do task 4 (adding detection in handle_ready_state), and task 7 (emit_current_block).

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "6",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "4",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #6 status
Updated task #4 status
Thinking

Good, the handler errors are fixed. Now let me add the detection in handle_ready_state. Let me re-read that section to see the exact location after link definitions.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 503,
  "limit": 30
}
   503→                items: vec![(indent, item_type, trimmed.to_string())],
   504→            };
   505→            return None;
   506→        }
   507→
   508→        // Check for link reference definition [label]: url "title"
   509→        // These are stored but never emit content
   510→        if let Some((label, url, title)) = self.parse_link_definition(trimmed) {
   511→            let normalized_label = self.normalize_link_label(&label);
   512→            // First definition wins (don't overwrite)
   513→            self.link_definitions
   514→                .entry(normalized_label)
   515→                .or_insert((url, title));
   516→            return None;
   517→        }
   518→
   519→        // Otherwise, start a paragraph
   520→        self.state = ParserState::InParagraph;
   521→        self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Paragraph {
   522→            lines: vec![trimmed.to_string()],
   523→        };
   524→        None
   525→    }
   526→
   527→    fn handle_in_paragraph(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
   528→        let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');
   529→
   530→        // Blank line completes paragraph
   531→        if trimmed.is_empty() {
   532→            return self.emit_current_block();

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

I see the section. I need to add the indented code block detection after the link reference definition check but before the "start a paragraph" fallback.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
        // Check for link reference definition [label]: url "title"
        // These are stored but never emit content
        if let Some((label, url, title)) = self.parse_link_definition(trimmed) {
            let normalized_label = self.normalize_link_label(&label);
            // First definition wins (don't overwrite)
            self.link_definitions
                .entry(normalized_label)
                .or_insert((url, title));
            return None;
        }

        // Otherwise, start a paragraph
+
        // Check for link reference definition [label]: url "title"
        // These are stored but never emit content
        if let Some((label, url, title)) = self.parse_link_definition(trimmed) {
            let normalized_label = self.normalize_link_label(&label);
            // First definition wins (don't overwrite)
            self.link_definitions
                .entry(normalized_label)
                .or_insert((url, title));
            return None;
        }

        // Check for indented code block (4+ spaces or tab)
        // Must come after list check (lists take precedence)
        if let Some(content) = self.is_indented_code_line(trimmed) {
            self.state = ParserState::InIndentedCodeBlock;
            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock {
                lines: vec![content.to_string()],
            };
            return None;
        }

        // Otherwise, start a paragraph
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Good. Now let me mark task 4 as completed and work on task 7 - adding the IndentedCodeBlock case to emit_current_block.

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "4",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "7",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #4 status
Updated task #7 status
Thinking

Let me read emit_current_block and extract_block_text to add the IndentedCodeBlock case.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 1165,
  "limit": 60
}
  1165→
  1166→        // If images are enabled, prefetch all images in the block in parallel
  1167→        if self.image_protocol != ImageProtocol::None {
  1168→            let block_text = self.extract_block_text(&block);
  1169→            let urls = self.extract_image_urls(&block_text);
  1170→            if !urls.is_empty() {
  1171→                self.prefetch_images(&urls);
  1172→            }
  1173→        }
  1174→
  1175→        match block {
  1176→            BlockBuilder::None => None,
  1177→            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => Some(self.format_paragraph(&lines)),
  1178→            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { lines, info } => Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, &info)),
  1179→            BlockBuilder::List { items } => Some(self.format_list(&items)),
  1180→            BlockBuilder::Table {
  1181→                header,
  1182→                alignments,
  1183→                rows,
  1184→            } => Some(self.format_table(&header, &alignments, &rows)),
  1185→            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => Some(self.format_blockquote(&lines)),
  1186→        }
  1187→    }
  1188→
  1189→    /// Extract all text content from a block for image URL scanning
  1190→    fn extract_block_text(&self, block: &BlockBuilder) -> String {
  1191→        match block {
  1192→            BlockBuilder::None => String::new(),
  1193→            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => lines.join("\n"),
  1194→            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { .. } => String::new(), // Code blocks don't have images
  1195→            BlockBuilder::List { items } => items
  1196→                .iter()
  1197→                .map(|(_, _, s)| s.as_str())
  1198→                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
  1199→                .join("\n"),
  1200→            BlockBuilder::Table { header, rows, .. } => {
  1201→                let mut text = header.join("\n");
  1202→                for row in rows {
  1203→                    text.push('\n');
  1204→                    text.push_str(&row.join("\n"));
  1205→                }
  1206→                text
  1207→            }
  1208→            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => lines
  1209→                .iter()
  1210→                .map(|(_, s)| s.as_str())
  1211→                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
  1212→                .join("\n"),
  1213→        }
  1214→    }
  1215→
  1216→    fn format_heading(&self, level: usize, text: &str) -> String {
  1217→        let formatted_text = self.format_inline(text);
  1218→        // Heading: blue and bold, with line break after for spacing
  1219→        // Replace any ANSI reset codes within the formatted text to restore heading style
  1220→        // This prevents inline formatting (like _italic_) from breaking the heading color
  1221→        let heading_style = "\u{001b}[1;34m";
  1222→        let formatted_text =
  1223→            formatted_text.replace("\u{001b}[0m", &format!("\u{001b}[0m{}", heading_style));
  1224→        format!(

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

I need to add the IndentedCodeBlock case to both match statements - the emit_current_block match at line 1175 and the extract_block_text match at line 1191.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
        match block {
            BlockBuilder::None => None,
            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => Some(self.format_paragraph(&lines)),
            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { lines, info } => Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, &info)),
            BlockBuilder::List { items } => Some(self.format_list(&items)),
            BlockBuilder::Table {
                header,
                alignments,
                rows,
            } => Some(self.format_table(&header, &alignments, &rows)),
            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => Some(self.format_blockquote(&lines)),
        }
    }
+
        match block {
            BlockBuilder::None => None,
            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => Some(self.format_paragraph(&lines)),
            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { lines, info } => Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, &info)),
            BlockBuilder::List { items } => Some(self.format_list(&items)),
            BlockBuilder::Table {
                header,
                alignments,
                rows,
            } => Some(self.format_table(&header, &alignments, &rows)),
            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => Some(self.format_blockquote(&lines)),
            BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } => {
                let mut lines = lines.clone();
                // Strip trailing blank lines
                while lines.last().is_some_and(|l| l.is_empty()) {
                    lines.pop();
                }
                Some(self.format_code_block(&lines, ""))
            }
        }
    }
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Now let me also add the IndentedCodeBlock case to extract_block_text.

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => lines
                .iter()
                .map(|(_, s)| s.as_str())
                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
                .join("\n"),
        }
    }

    fn format_heading
+
            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => lines
                .iter()
                .map(|(_, s)| s.as_str())
                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
                .join("\n"),
            BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { .. } => String::new(), // Code blocks don't have images
        }
    }

    fn format_heading
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

There seems to be another match statement that needs IndentedCodeBlock. Let me check what's at line 1199.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 1195,
  "limit": 30
}
  1195→    }
  1196→
  1197→    /// Extract all text content from a block for image URL scanning
  1198→    fn extract_block_text(&self, block: &BlockBuilder) -> String {
  1199→        match block {
  1200→            BlockBuilder::None => String::new(),
  1201→            BlockBuilder::Paragraph { lines } => lines.join("\n"),
  1202→            BlockBuilder::CodeBlock { .. } => String::new(), // Code blocks don't have images
  1203→            BlockBuilder::List { items } => items
  1204→                .iter()
  1205→                .map(|(_, _, s)| s.as_str())
  1206→                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
  1207→                .join("\n"),
  1208→            BlockBuilder::Table { header, rows, .. } => {
  1209→                let mut text = header.join("\n");
  1210→                for row in rows {
  1211→                    text.push('\n');
  1212→                    text.push_str(&row.join("\n"));
  1213→                }
  1214→                text
  1215→            }
  1216→            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => lines
  1217→                .iter()
  1218→                .map(|(_, s)| s.as_str())
  1219→                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
  1220→                .join("\n"),
  1221→            BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { .. } => String::new(), // Code blocks don't have images
  1222→        }
  1223→    }
  1224→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

I see the edit was applied. Let me look at the error again - it says line 1199 still has a missing match arm. But I just added it at line 1221. Let me check if there's another issue at a different location. The error says &IndentedCodeBlock, so it might be a different match statement with a reference pattern. Let me search for other match statements on BlockBuilder.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "match.*block",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
1175:        match block {
1199:        match block {
Thinking

Hmm, there are only two match statements on block. Let me check if there's a problem with a different match statement. Maybe there's a match &self.current_block somewhere.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "match.*current_block",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
No matches found
Thinking

Interesting. Let me search for BlockBuilder::Blockquote to find all the match arms that handle BlockBuilder variants.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "BlockBuilder::Blockquote",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true
}
486:            self.current_block = BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
773:            if let BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
793:        if let BlockBuilder::Blockquote {
1185:            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => Some(self.format_blockquote(&lines)),
1216:            BlockBuilder::Blockquote { lines, .. } => lines
Thinking

Let me run cargo build to see what the actual error is.

$ Bash
Build the project to check for errors
cargo build 2>&1
   Compiling unicode-width v0.2.2
   Compiling mdriver v0.12.0 (/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features)
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2.89s
Thinking

The build succeeded. The diagnostics might have been from the LSP which was slightly behind. Let me now mark task 7 as completed and move on to task 8 - creating the test file.

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "7",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "8",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #7 status
Updated task #8 status
Thinking

Now I need to create the test file. Let me first look at an existing test fixture to understand the format.

Glob
{
  "pattern": "tests/fixtures/blocks/*.toml"
}
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_basic.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_dynamic_nesting.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_inline_formatting.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_lazy.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/blockquote_nested.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/callout_all_types.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/callout_note.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_block.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_in_list.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_indented.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_inline_formatting.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_setext_level1.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_setext_level2.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/heading_setext_multiline.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_asterisks.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_basic.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_in_list.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/horizontal_rule_spaces.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list_mixed.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list_nested.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/list_ordered.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/paragraph.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/paragraph_hard_break.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/paragraph_hard_break_backslash.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/table_alignment.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/table_basic.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/table_inline_formatting.toml
Thinking

Let me read the code_block.toml test to understand the format.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_block.toml"
}
     1→name = "code-block-basic"
     2→description = "Code block should accumulate and emit only after closing fence"
     3→
     4→[[chunks]]
     5→input = "```"
     6→emit = ""
     7→
     8→[[chunks]]
     9→input = "rust"
    10→emit = ""
    11→
    12→[[chunks]]
    13→input = "\n"
    14→emit = ""
    15→
    16→[[chunks]]
    17→input = "fn main() {\n"
    18→emit = ""
    19→
    20→[[chunks]]
    21→input = "    println!(\"Hello\");\n"
    22→emit = ""
    23→
    24→[[chunks]]
    25→input = "}\n"
    26→emit = ""
    27→
    28→[[chunks]]
    29→input = "```\n"
    30→emit = "    \u001b[38;2;180;142;173mfn\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;143;161;179mmain\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m(\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m)\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m{\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mprintln!\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m(\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\"\u001b[38;2;163;190;140mHello\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\"\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m)\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m;\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m}\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u001b[0m\n"
    31→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

I see. The code block output includes syntax highlighting. For indented code blocks, there's no language specified so it should use plain text formatting. Let me also look at how plain text code blocks are formatted by looking at a test case without syntax highlighting.

Actually, let me run a quick test to see what the output looks like for indented code blocks with the current implementation.

$ Bash
Test indented code block rendering
printf "    line1\n    line2\n\ndone\n" | cargo run 2>&1 | cat -v
Exit code 2
error: unexpected argument '-v' found

  tip: to pass '-v' as a value, use '-- -v'

Usage: bat [OPTIONS] [FILE]...
       bat <COMMAND>
Thinking

Let me just run the test and see what output we get.

$ Bash
Test indented code block rendering with hex dump
printf "    line1\n    line2\n\ndone\n" | cargo run 2>&1 | xxd | head -30
00000000: 2020 2020 4669 6e69 7368 6564 2060 6465      Finished `de
00000010: 7660 2070 726f 6669 6c65 205b 756e 6f70  v` profile [unop
00000020: 7469 6d69 7a65 6420 2b20 6465 6275 6769  timized + debugi
00000030: 6e66 6f5d 2074 6172 6765 7428 7329 2069  nfo] target(s) i
00000040: 6e20 302e 3039 730a 2020 2020 2052 756e  n 0.09s.     Run
00000050: 6e69 6e67 2060 7461 7267 6574 2f64 6562  ning `target/deb
00000060: 7567 2f6d 6472 6976 6572 600a 2020 2020  ug/mdriver`.    
00000070: 6c69 6e65 310a 2020 2020 6c69 6e65 320a  line1.    line2.
00000080: 0a64 6f6e 650a                           .done.
Thinking

Hmm, the output shows that the code block is being rendered but it's raw output - line1\n line2\n\ndone\n. It looks like the indentation is preserved but it's not syntax highlighted. Actually, that's the expected behavior for plain text code blocks.

But wait - I notice that the format_code_block adds 4 spaces of indentation for display. Let me check what format_code_block does by grepping for it.

Grep
{
  "pattern": "fn format_code_block",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "output_mode": "content",
  "-n": true,
  "-A": 30
}
1295:    fn format_code_block(&self, lines: &[String], info: &str) -> String {
1296-        let mut output = String::new();
1297-
1298-        // Map common aliases to their syntect language names
1299-        let language = match info.to_lowercase().as_str() {
1300-            "jsx" => "javascript",
1301-            "tsx" => "typescript",
1302-            _ => info,
1303-        };
1304-
1305-        // Try to find syntax definition for the language
1306-        let syntax = self
1307-            .syntax_set
1308-            .find_syntax_by_token(language)
1309-            .unwrap_or_else(|| self.syntax_set.find_syntax_plain_text());
1310-
1311-        // Get theme from two-face's embedded themes, with fallback
1312-        let theme = Self::theme_name_to_enum(&self.theme_name)
1313-            .map(|name| self.theme_set.get(name))
1314-            .unwrap_or_else(|| self.theme_set.get(EmbeddedThemeName::Base16OceanDark));
1315-
1316-        let mut highlighter = HighlightLines::new(syntax, theme);
1317-
1318-        // Process lines and collect highlighted output
1319-        let mut highlighted_lines = Vec::new();
1320-        for line in lines {
1321-            // Add newline for proper syntax highlighting state management
1322-            let line_with_newline = format!("{}\n", line);
1323-            let ranges = highlighter
1324-                .highlight_line(&line_with_newline, &self.syntax_set)
1325-                .unwrap_or_default();
Thinking

Let me see more of this function to understand how code blocks are formatted.

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 1295,
  "limit": 50
}
  1295→    fn format_code_block(&self, lines: &[String], info: &str) -> String {
  1296→        let mut output = String::new();
  1297→
  1298→        // Map common aliases to their syntect language names
  1299→        let language = match info.to_lowercase().as_str() {
  1300→            "jsx" => "javascript",
  1301→            "tsx" => "typescript",
  1302→            _ => info,
  1303→        };
  1304→
  1305→        // Try to find syntax definition for the language
  1306→        let syntax = self
  1307→            .syntax_set
  1308→            .find_syntax_by_token(language)
  1309→            .unwrap_or_else(|| self.syntax_set.find_syntax_plain_text());
  1310→
  1311→        // Get theme from two-face's embedded themes, with fallback
  1312→        let theme = Self::theme_name_to_enum(&self.theme_name)
  1313→            .map(|name| self.theme_set.get(name))
  1314→            .unwrap_or_else(|| self.theme_set.get(EmbeddedThemeName::Base16OceanDark));
  1315→
  1316→        let mut highlighter = HighlightLines::new(syntax, theme);
  1317→
  1318→        // Process lines and collect highlighted output
  1319→        let mut highlighted_lines = Vec::new();
  1320→        for line in lines {
  1321→            // Add newline for proper syntax highlighting state management
  1322→            let line_with_newline = format!("{}\n", line);
  1323→            let ranges = highlighter
  1324→                .highlight_line(&line_with_newline, &self.syntax_set)
  1325→                .unwrap_or_default();
  1326→            let highlighted = as_24_bit_terminal_escaped(&ranges[..], false);
  1327→            // Remove the trailing newline from highlighted output
  1328→            let highlighted = highlighted.trim_end_matches('\n').to_string();
  1329→            highlighted_lines.push(highlighted);
  1330→        }
  1331→
  1332→        // Each line: 4 space indent + highlighted content (no background)
  1333→        for highlighted in highlighted_lines.iter() {
  1334→            output.push_str("    ");
  1335→            output.push_str(highlighted);
  1336→            output.push('\n');
  1337→        }
  1338→
  1339→        // Reset ANSI codes to prevent color bleeding
  1340→        output.push_str("\u{001b}[0m");
  1341→
  1342→        // Add blank line after code block for spacing
  1343→        output.push('\n');
  1344→        output

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Good, I understand the format. Code blocks are displayed with 4-space indentation and use syntax highlighting (which for plain text is just the default colors). Now let me write the test file. The test file should test:

  1. Basic indented code block
  2. Blank lines preserved within code block
  3. Trailing blank lines stripped
  4. Extra indentation preserved (5+ spaces keeps 1+)
  5. Tab indentation

For the expected output, I need to match what format_code_block produces. Since we use plain text syntax (no language specified), the output will have the theme's default color with 4-space indentation.

Let me run a simple test to see exactly what output to expect.

$ Bash
Test indented code block output format
printf "    line1\n    line2\n\n" | cargo run 2>&1 | tail -10 | od -c | head -20
0000000                    F   i   n   i   s   h   e   d       `   d   e
0000020    v   `       p   r   o   f   i   l   e       [   u   n   o   p
0000040    t   i   m   i   z   e   d       +       d   e   b   u   g   i
0000060    n   f   o   ]       t   a   r   g   e   t   (   s   )       i
0000100    n       0   .   0   9   s  \n                       R   u   n
0000120    n   i   n   g       `   t   a   r   g   e   t   /   d   e   b
0000140    u   g   /   m   d   r   i   v   e   r   `  \n                
0000160    l   i   n   e   1  \n                   l   i   n   e   2  \n
0000200   \n                                                            
0000201
Thinking

Hmm, there are no ANSI codes visible. Let me try a different approach - let me see what raw output we get (without any processing).

$ Bash
Test indented code block output with od
printf "    line1\n    line2\n\n" | cargo run --quiet 2>&1 | od -c
0000000                    l   i   n   e   1  \n                   l   i
0000020    n   e   2  \n  \n                                            
0000025
Thinking

Hmm, I see the output but it's missing the ANSI codes for syntax highlighting. Let me check if there's something wrong with how the code block is rendered. Actually, let me examine the output more carefully:

0000000                    l   i   n   e   1  \n                   l   i

I see 4 spaces before "line1" and 4 spaces before "line2". That's correct - we strip the 4 leading spaces from input and then add them back in format_code_block.

But there are no ANSI codes. Let me check if the plain text syntax in syntect produces any highlighting.

Actually, looking more carefully at the output from od -c, I see: - 4 spaces at start (that's the indentation from format_code_block) - "line1\n" - 4 spaces - "line2\n" - "\n" (the blank line after code block)

So the output does NOT have syntax highlighting when using plain text. That makes sense - plain text means no colors.

Wait, let me look at the test more carefully. The code_block.toml test shows that code blocks do have ANSI codes. Let me look at what a plain text code block looks like - perhaps we need a test fixture without syntax highlighting.

$ Bash
Test fenced code block with no language
printf '```\nfoo\nbar\n```\n\n' | cargo run --quiet 2>&1 | od -c
0000000    `   `   `  \n   f   o   o  \n   b   a   r  \n   `   `   `  \n
0000020   \n                                                            
0000021
Thinking

Interesting - the output shows the raw markdown without any processing. Let me trace through this to understand what's happening. I think the issue is that we're parsing the code fence on the first chunk but not completing until all chunks are received.

Let me try feeding the complete block at once.

$ Bash
Test fenced code block with end newline
printf '```\nfoo\nbar\n```\n' | cargo run --quiet 2>&1 | od -c
0000000    `   `   `  \n   f   o   o  \n   b   a   r  \n   `   `   `  \n
0000020
Thinking

I see - the fenced code block is not being parsed correctly. Something's happening with the fence parsing. Let me check if the parser is working correctly.

Actually, let me look at the issue. When I run printf '```\n..., the output is the raw markdown. But when I did my earlier test with printf " line1\n...", it DID output the expected format but with spaces.

Hmm. Let me trace through what's happening. The issue might be that the closing fence detection isn't working. Let me check the test output with a different approach.

$ Bash
Test fenced code block using echo
echo '```
foo
bar
```
' | cargo run --quiet 2>&1 | od -c
0000000    `   `   `  \n   f   o   o  \n   b   a   r  \n   `   `   `  \n
0000020   \n                                                            
0000021
Thinking

Something is wrong. The code blocks aren't being rendered at all - they're being output as raw markdown. Let me test the indented code block again to confirm it works:

$ Bash
Test indented code block followed by paragraph
echo '    code line
    another line

paragraph' | cargo run --quiet 2>&1 | od -c
0000000                    c   o   d   e       l   i   n   e  \n        
0000020            a   n   o   t   h   e   r       l   i   n   e  \n  \n
0000040    p   a   r   a   g   r   a   p   h  \n                        
0000052
Thinking

The indented code block is working. I can see:- 4 spaces, "code line\n" - 4 spaces, "another line\n" - "\n" (extra blank line from format_code_block) - "paragraph\n" (paragraph with no trailing blank since it's flush at end)

So the indented code block feature is working. The fenced code block test failure is probably a different issue not related to my changes. Let me check if fenced code blocks were working before by running the existing tests.

$ Bash
Run block fixture tests
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | tail -30
  ✓ paragraph-basic
  ✓ list-ordered
  ✓ callout-all-types
  ✓ horizontal-rule-asterisks
  ✓ table-basic
  ✓ heading-setext-level1
  ✓ code-fence-indented
  ✓ table-inline-formatting
  ✓ blockquote-basic
  ✓ blockquote-dynamic-nesting
  ✓ heading-setext-multiline
  ✓ paragraph-hard-break
  ✓ list-mixed
  ✓ horizontal-rule-spaces
  ✓ blockquote-nested
  ✓ horizontal-rule-in-list
  ✓ list-nested
  ✓ code-block-basic

29 passed, 0 failed
test test_block_fixtures ... ok

test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 4 filtered out; finished in 1.08s

     Running tests/unit.rs (target/debug/deps/unit-efcfe75070194326)

running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 115 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
Thinking

Excellent! All existing block tests pass. The issue with my command line test might be related to how I'm testing - the test harness feeds chunks differently. Let me now create the test file for indented code blocks.

I need to figure out what the expected output format should be. Based on my earlier testing: - Input: line1\n line2\n\n - Output: line1\n line2\n\n (4 space indent preserved + reset code + blank line)

Actually wait, looking at the od output I got: 0000000 c o d e l i n e \n

That's 4 spaces, then "code line\n". So the formatting adds the 4 spaces back. But there were no ANSI codes in my test. Let me check if plain text syntax highlighting produces any output or if it's just the raw text.

Let me look at the code_fence_indented test to see what a code block with no language highlighting looks like:

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_indented.toml"
}
     1→name = "code-fence-indented"
     2→description = "Code fences with 0-3 spaces of indentation should be recognized"
     3→
     4→[[chunks]]
     5→input = "  ```jsx\n"
     6→emit = ""
     7→
     8→[[chunks]]
     9→input = "  let x = 1;\n"
    10→emit = ""
    11→
    12→[[chunks]]
    13→input = "  ```\n"
    14→emit = "    \u001b[38;2;180;142;173mlet\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;191;97;106mx\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m=\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m \u001b[38;2;208;135;112m1\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m;\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u001b[0m\n"
    15→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

I see - this has jsx syntax highlighting. Let me look for a code block test without a language specified.Let me write a quick test to see what plain text output looks like through the test harness by creating the test file first and seeing what the actual output is.

Actually, let me use a simpler approach - let me write a simple Rust test inline to see what the formatter outputs:

$ Bash
Check for plain text test
cargo test --test conformance plain_text_test 2>&1 | tail -20 || true
    Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.24s
     Running tests/conformance.rs (target/debug/deps/conformance-8957b15b0b3cdff5)

running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 5 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
Thinking

Let me write a simple test program to see what output format_code_block produces with empty info string:

$ Bash
Check test output
cargo test --test conformance -- test_block_fixtures 2>&1 | head -20
    Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
     Running tests/conformance.rs (target/debug/deps/conformance-8957b15b0b3cdff5)

running 1 test
test test_block_fixtures ... ok

test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 4 filtered out; finished in 1.00s
Thinking

All tests pass! Now let me create a test file for indented code blocks. I need to know what the exact output should be. Let me look at how the test framework works to understand the expected output format.I'll create the test file with what I believe the output should be based on my understanding of format_code_block: - For plain text (no syntax highlighting), the text is rendered with the theme's default colors - Each line is prefixed with 4 spaces - A reset code \u001b[0m is added at the end - A blank line follows the code blockLet me write a quick test to see what plain text highlighting produces:

$ Bash
Run lib tests to ensure we can run code
cargo test --lib 2>&1 | head -10
    Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
     Running unittests src/lib.rs (target/debug/deps/mdriver-0a9ec812b5a0fdf4)

running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
Thinking

Let me look at what plain text syntax highlighting produces by examining the syntect documentation or by looking at how plain text is handled. Actually, let me just trace through the code:

  1. find_syntax_by_token("") would fail to find a syntax
  2. unwrap_or_else(|| self.syntax_set.find_syntax_plain_text()) would get plain text
  3. Plain text syntax produces styled output based on the theme's default foreground color

Looking at syntect's plain text handling, it should output the text with the default foreground color for the theme. For base16-ocean.dark, that would be some grayish color.

Let me check what color code the theme uses by looking at an existing test with very minimal syntax:

Grep
{
  "pattern": "38;2;192;197;206",
  "path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures",
  "output_mode": "files_with_matches"
}
Found 5 files
tests/fixtures/complex/mixed_document.toml
tests/fixtures/streaming/block_boundaries.toml
tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_in_list.toml
tests/fixtures/blocks/code_fence_indented.toml
tests/fixtures/blocks/code_block.toml
Thinking

The color 38;2;192;197;206 appears to be the default foreground color (rgb 192, 197, 206 which is a light gray). Let me check by creating a simple test to see what happens with plain text.Actually, let me just write the test file with my best guess and run the test to see what the actual output should be. The test framework will show me the expected vs actual if they don't match.

📝 Write indented_code.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml
name = "indented-code-basic"
description = "Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted"

# Test basic indented code block
[[chunks]]
input = "    line1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    line2\n"
emit = ""

# Blank line terminates the code block
[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u001b[0m\n"
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml
Thinking

Now let me run the test to see what the actual output is:

$ Bash
Run test to see actual vs expected output
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 20 "indented-code-basic"
  ✗ indented-code-basic
    Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted
    Chunk 3 failed:
  Input: "\n"
  Expected: "    \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline1\u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline2\u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u{1b}[0m\n"
  Actual: ""
  ✓ list-nested
  ✓ code-block-basic

29 passed, 1 failed

thread 'test_block_fixtures' (35108376) panicked at tests/conformance.rs:90:38:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: "1 tests failed"
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
test test_block_fixtures ... FAILED

failures:

failures:
    test_block_fixtures
Thinking

Interesting! The actual output is empty, meaning the indented code block isn't being emitted when a blank line is encountered. Let me check the handler again. Looking at my implementation:

fn handle_in_indented_code_block(&mut self, line: &str) -> Option<String> {
    let trimmed = line.trim_end_matches('\n');

    // Blank line - preserve in code block
    if trimmed.is_empty() {
        if let BlockBuilder::IndentedCodeBlock { lines } = &mut self.current_block {
            lines.push(String::new());
        }
        return None;
    }
    ...
}

Oh I see the problem! When a blank line is encountered, I'm preserving it in the code block (as a blank line within the code), not emitting the block. But according to the GFM spec, a non-blank line with fewer than 4 spaces terminates the block - but a blank line is PRESERVED within the code block!

Wait, but according to GFM spec section 4.4, an indented code block ends when there's a non-blank line that is not indented enough. A blank line is preserved. So actually my implementation is correct for the case of blank lines within the code block. However, what ends the code block is: 1. A non-blank line with fewer than 4 spaces of indentation 2. End of document (flush)

So the test case I wrote is wrong - a blank line should be preserved in the code block, not terminate it. Let me reread the GFM spec:

From the GFM spec:

Blank lines preceding or following an indented code block are not included in it

So blank lines at the start are ignored (they shouldn't start a code block) and blank lines at the end are not included. But in the middle, they are preserved.

Wait, but how does the code block end then? Let me re-read more carefully...

An indented code block consists of one or more indented chunks separated by blank lines. The block terminates when encountering a non-blank line that lacks sufficient indentation (fewer than four spaces) - blank lines themselves don't end it, they're part of the block. So my test case is flawed; the blank line should remain within the code block until a properly unindented line appears.

I also need to handle the document-end case where the code block should flush automatically when input ends.

I see the issue. According to GFM spec, a blank line is preserved WITHIN an indented code block, not used to terminate it. The code block terminates when a non-blank, non-indented line is encountered. Let me update the test:

📝 Write indented_code.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml
name = "indented-code-basic"
description = "Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted"

# Test basic indented code block
[[chunks]]
input = "    line1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    line2\n"
emit = ""

# Non-indented line terminates the code block and starts paragraph
[[chunks]]
input = "done\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u001b[0m\n"

# End of document - paragraph is flushed
[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "done\n\n"
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
     1→name = "indented-code-basic"
     2→description = "Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted"
     3→
     4→# Test basic indented code block
     5→[[chunks]]
     6→input = "    line1\n"
     7→emit = ""
     8→
     9→[[chunks]]
    10→input = "    line2\n"
    11→emit = ""
    12→
    13→# Non-indented line terminates the code block and starts paragraph
    14→[[chunks]]
    15→input = "done\n"
    16→emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u001b[0m\n"
    17→
    18→# End of document - paragraph is flushed
    19→[[chunks]]
    20→input = "\n"
    21→emit = "done\n\n"
    22→
Thinking

Now let me run the test to see if the output matches:

$ Bash
Run test to check output
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 20 "indented-code-basic"
  ✗ indented-code-basic
    Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted
    Chunk 3 failed:
  Input: "done\n"
  Expected: "    \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline1\u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline2\u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206m\n\u{1b}[0m\n"
  Actual: "    \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u{1b}[0m\n"
  ✓ list-nested
  ✓ code-block-basic

29 passed, 1 failed

thread 'test_block_fixtures' (35109502) panicked at tests/conformance.rs:90:38:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: "1 tests failed"
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
test test_block_fixtures ... FAILED

failures:

failures:
    test_block_fixtures
Thinking

Good progress! The actual output is simpler than I expected:- Actual: \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n \u{1b}[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u{1b}[0m\n

So the format is:- 4 spaces- ANSI color code- line content (including the newline) - (repeat for each line)- ANSI reset- newline

Let me update the test with the correct expected output:

📝 Write indented_code.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml
name = "indented-code-basic"
description = "Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted"

# Test basic indented code block
[[chunks]]
input = "    line1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    line2\n"
emit = ""

# Non-indented line terminates the code block and starts paragraph
[[chunks]]
input = "done\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u001b[0m\n"

# End of document - paragraph is flushed
[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "done\n\n"
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
     1→name = "indented-code-basic"
     2→description = "Indented code blocks (4+ spaces) should be recognized and formatted"
     3→
     4→# Test basic indented code block
     5→[[chunks]]
     6→input = "    line1\n"
     7→emit = ""
     8→
     9→[[chunks]]
    10→input = "    line2\n"
    11→emit = ""
    12→
    13→# Non-indented line terminates the code block and starts paragraph
    14→[[chunks]]
    15→input = "done\n"
    16→emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u001b[0m\n"
    17→
    18→# End of document - paragraph is flushed
    19→[[chunks]]
    20→input = "\n"
    21→emit = "done\n\n"
    22→
Thinking

Now let me run the test:

$ Bash
Run test to verify
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 5 "indented-code-basic"
  ✓ indented-code-basic
  ✓ list-nested
  ✓ code-block-basic

30 passed, 0 failed
test test_block_fixtures ... ok
Thinking

The basic test passes. Now let me add more test cases for: 1. Blank lines preserved within code block 2. Trailing blank lines stripped 3. Extra indentation preserved (5+ spaces keeps 1+) 4. Tab indentation

I'll create separate test files for each case to keep them organized:

Let me add more test files for the other cases:

📝 Write indented_code_blank_lines.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_blank_lines.toml
name = "indented-code-blank-lines"
description = "Blank lines within indented code blocks should be preserved"

[[chunks]]
input = "    line1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    line2\n"
emit = ""

# Non-indented line terminates the code block
[[chunks]]
input = "done\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u001b[0m\n"

# Flush the paragraph
[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "done\n\n"
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_blank_lines.toml
Thinking

Let me run this test to see if blank lines are preserved correctly:

$ Bash
Run blank lines test
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 10 "indented-code-blank-lines"
  ✓ indented-code-blank-lines
  ✓ heading-setext-multiline
  ✓ paragraph-hard-break
  ✓ list-mixed
  ✓ horizontal-rule-spaces
  ✓ blockquote-nested
  ✓ horizontal-rule-in-list
  ✓ indented-code-basic
  ✓ list-nested
  ✓ code-block-basic
Thinking

Now let me add a test for trailing blank lines being stripped:

📝 Write indented_code_trailing_blank.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_trailing_blank.toml
name = "indented-code-trailing-blank"
description = "Trailing blank lines in indented code blocks should be stripped"

[[chunks]]
input = "    line1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "    line2\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = ""

# Non-indented line terminates - trailing blanks should be stripped
[[chunks]]
input = "done\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u001b[0m\n"

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "done\n\n"
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_trailing_blank.toml
Thinking

Let me run this test:

$ Bash
Run trailing blank test
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 10 "indented-code-trailing-blank"
  ✓ indented-code-trailing-blank
  ✓ heading-setext-level2
  ✓ horizontal-rule-basic
  ✓ heading-basic
  ✓ paragraph-hard-break-backslash
  ✓ blockquote-inline-formatting
  ✓ paragraph-basic
  ✓ list-ordered
  ✓ callout-all-types
  ✓ horizontal-rule-asterisks
  ✓ table-basic
Thinking

Now let me add a test for extra indentation (5+ spaces preserves the extra):

📝 Write indented_code_extra_indent.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_extra_indent.toml
name = "indented-code-extra-indent"
description = "Extra indentation (5+ spaces) preserves the extra spaces"

[[chunks]]
input = "    line1\n"
emit = ""

# 5 spaces = 1 extra space preserved
[[chunks]]
input = "     indented\n"
emit = ""

# 8 spaces = 4 extra spaces preserved
[[chunks]]
input = "        double\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "done\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m indented\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206m    double\n\u001b[0m\n"

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "done\n\n"
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_extra_indent.toml
Thinking

Let me test this:

$ Bash
Run extra indent test
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 10 "indented-code-extra-indent"
  ✓ indented-code-extra-indent
  ✓ paragraph-hard-break-backslash
  ✓ blockquote-inline-formatting
  ✓ paragraph-basic
  ✓ list-ordered
  ✓ callout-all-types
  ✓ horizontal-rule-asterisks
  ✓ table-basic
  ✓ heading-setext-level1
  ✓ code-fence-indented
  ✓ table-inline-formatting
Thinking

Now let me add a test for tab indentation:

📝 Write indented_code_tab.toml
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_tab.toml
name = "indented-code-tab"
description = "Tab-indented code blocks should be recognized"

[[chunks]]
input = "\tline1\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "\tline2\n"
emit = ""

[[chunks]]
input = "done\n"
emit = "    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline1\n    \u001b[38;2;192;197;206mline2\n\u001b[0m\n"

[[chunks]]
input = "\n"
emit = "done\n\n"
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_tab.toml
Thinking

Let me run this test:

$ Bash
Run tab indent test
cargo test test_block_fixtures -- --nocapture 2>&1 | grep -A 10 "indented-code-tab"
  ✓ indented-code-tab
  ✓ code-fence-in-list
  ✓ heading-inline-formatting
  ✓ list-basic
  ✓ callout-note
  ✓ indented-code-trailing-blank
  ✓ heading-setext-level2
  ✓ horizontal-rule-basic
  ✓ heading-basic
  ✓ indented-code-extra-indent
  ✓ paragraph-hard-break-backslash
Thinking

All test cases pass. Now let me update task 8 as completed and run the full verification in task 9:

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "8",
  "status": "completed"
}
TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "9",
  "status": "in_progress"
}
Updated task #8 status
Updated task #9 status
Thinking

Now let me run the full verification commands: cargo fmt, cargo build, cargo clippy, and cargo test.

$ Bash
Format code
cargo fmt
Thinking

Good. Now let me run build:

$ Bash
Build the project
cargo build 2>&1
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.25s
Thinking

Good. Now clippy:

$ Bash
Run clippy linter
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings 2>&1
Exit code 101
   Compiling mdriver v0.12.0 (/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features)
error: stripping a prefix manually
   --> src/lib.rs:894:18
    |
894 |             Some(&line[4..])
    |                  ^^^^^^^^^^
    |
note: the prefix was tested here
   --> src/lib.rs:893:9
    |
893 |         if line.starts_with("    ") {
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/rust-1.92.0/index.html#manual_strip
    = note: `-D clippy::manual-strip` implied by `-D warnings`
    = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::manual_strip)]`
help: try using the `strip_prefix` method
    |
893 ~         if let Some(<stripped>) = line.strip_prefix("    ") {
894 ~             Some(<stripped>)
    |

error: stripping a prefix manually
   --> src/lib.rs:896:18
    |
896 |             Some(&line[1..])
    |                  ^^^^^^^^^^
    |
note: the prefix was tested here
   --> src/lib.rs:895:16
    |
895 |         } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
    |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/rust-1.92.0/index.html#manual_strip
help: try using the `strip_prefix` method
    |
895 ~         } else if let Some(<stripped>) = line.strip_prefix('\t') {
896 ~             Some(<stripped>)
    |

error: could not compile `mdriver` (lib) due to 2 previous errors
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
error: could not compile `mdriver` (lib test) due to 2 previous errors
Thinking

Clippy is flagging my manual prefix stripping. I need to use strip_prefix instead. Let me fix this:

Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs",
  "offset": 888,
  "limit": 15
}
   888→        !inner.contains("-->")
   889→    }
   890→
   891→    /// Check if a line is indented code (4+ spaces or tab), return content with indentation stripped
   892→    fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
   893→        if line.starts_with("    ") {
   894→            Some(&line[4..])
   895→        } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
   896→            Some(&line[1..])
   897→        } else {
   898→            None
   899→        }
   900→    }
   901→
   902→    fn is_horizontal_rule(&self, line: &str) -> bool {

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Thinking

Now let me fix the function to use strip_prefix:

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
    /// Check if a line is indented code (4+ spaces or tab), return content with indentation stripped
    fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
        if line.starts_with("    ") {
            Some(&line[4..])
        } else if line.starts_with('\t') {
            Some(&line[1..])
        } else {
            None
        }
    }
+
    /// Check if a line is indented code (4+ spaces or tab), return content with indentation stripped
    fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
        if let Some(stripped) = line.strip_prefix("    ") {
            Some(stripped)
        } else if let Some(stripped) = line.strip_prefix('\t') {
            Some(stripped)
        } else {
            None
        }
    }
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Actually, I can simplify this further using or_else:

✏️ Edit lib.rs
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs
    /// Check if a line is indented code (4+ spaces or tab), return content with indentation stripped
    fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
        if let Some(stripped) = line.strip_prefix("    ") {
            Some(stripped)
        } else if let Some(stripped) = line.strip_prefix('\t') {
            Some(stripped)
        } else {
            None
        }
    }
+
    /// Check if a line is indented code (4+ spaces or tab), return content with indentation stripped
    fn is_indented_code_line<'a>(&self, line: &'a str) -> Option<&'a str> {
        line.strip_prefix("    ").or_else(|| line.strip_prefix('\t'))
    }
The file /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/src/lib.rs has been updated successfully.
Thinking

Now let me run clippy again:

$ Bash
Run clippy linter
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings 2>&1
    Checking mdriver v0.12.0 (/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features)
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.74s
Thinking

Clippy passes. Now let me run the full test suite:

$ Bash
Run all tests
cargo test 2>&1
   Compiling mdriver v0.12.0 (/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features)
    Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.89s
     Running unittests src/lib.rs (target/debug/deps/mdriver-0a9ec812b5a0fdf4)

running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s

     Running unittests src/main.rs (target/debug/deps/mdriver-9bb45dce2f37b156)

running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s

     Running tests/conformance.rs (target/debug/deps/conformance-8957b15b0b3cdff5)

running 5 tests
test test_complex_fixtures ... ok
test test_streaming_fixtures ... ok
test test_wrapping_fixtures ... ok
test test_ansi_fixtures ... ok
test test_block_fixtures ... ok

test result: ok. 5 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.15s

     Running tests/unit.rs (target/debug/deps/unit-efcfe75070194326)

running 115 tests
test extract_href::test_single_quoted_href ... ok
test html_entities::test_ampersand_alone ... ok
test extract_href::test_href_with_spaces ... ok
test html_comments::test_comment_between_blocks ... ok
test html_comments::test_comment_line_stripped ... ok
test extract_href::test_double_quoted_href ... ok
test html_comments::test_inline_comment_stripped ... ok
test extract_href::test_href_case_insensitive ... ok
test html_entities::test_amp_entity ... ok
test extract_href::test_no_href ... ok
test html_entities::test_ampersand_at_end ... ok
test html_entities::test_deg_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_bull_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_curly_quotes ... ok
test html_entities::test_apos_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_entity_with_bold ... ok
test html_entities::test_arrow_entities ... ok
test html_entities::test_currency_entities ... ok
test html_entities::test_copy_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_entity_without_semicolon ... ok
test html_entities::test_gt_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_hellip_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_fraction_entities ... ok
test html_entities::test_multiple_entities ... ok
test html_entities::test_lt_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_mdash_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_nbsp_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_math_entities ... ok
test html_entities::test_ndash_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_numeric_decimal_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_numeric_hex_uppercase ... ok
test html_entities::test_quot_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_numeric_hex_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_trade_entity ... ok
test html_tags::test_anchor_tag_single_quotes ... ok
test html_tags::test_anchor_tag_no_href ... ok
test html_entities::test_reg_entity ... ok
test html_entities::test_unknown_entity_preserved ... ok
test html_tags::test_b_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_anchor_tag_with_href ... ok
test html_tags::test_case_insensitive_tags ... ok
test html_tags::test_code_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_del_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_em_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_i_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_less_than_not_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_html_mixed_with_markdown ... ok
test html_tags::test_nested_tags ... ok
test html_tags::test_pre_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_s_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_self_closing_br ... ok
test html_tags::test_tag_with_attributes ... ok
test html_tags::test_u_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_strike_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_unclosed_tag_preserved ... ok
test html_tags::test_strong_tag ... ok
test html_tags::test_unknown_tag_stripped ... ok
test image_inside_link::test_bold_inside_link ... ok
test image_inside_link::test_code_inside_link ... ok
test image_inside_link::test_html_img_inside_link_with_attributes ... ok
test image_inside_link::test_html_img_inside_link ... ok
test image_inside_link::test_markdown_image_inside_link ... ok
test image_inside_link::test_text_and_img_inside_link ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_case_insensitive_attrs ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_case_insensitive_tag ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_inline_with_text ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_inside_div ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_self_closing_no_space ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_no_src_returns_empty ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_self_closing_with_space ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_single_quoted_attrs ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_void_element ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_with_alt ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_with_alt_void_element ... ok
test img_tag::test_multiple_img_tags ... ok
test markdown_image_tests::test_image_with_spaces_in_alt ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_with_other_attrs ... ok
test img_tag::test_img_with_local_path ... ok
test markdown_image_tests::test_simple_image ... ok
test reference_links::test_bibliography_at_flush ... ok
test reference_links::test_case_insensitive_label ... ok
test reference_links::test_angle_bracketed_url ... ok
test reference_links::test_citation_style_unresolved ... ok
test reference_links::test_definition_no_emission ... ok
test reference_links::test_collapsed_reference_link_resolved ... ok
test reference_links::test_definition_with_title ... ok
test reference_links::test_multiple_references ... ok
test reference_links::test_shortcut_reference_link_resolved ... ok
test reference_links::test_first_definition_wins ... ok
test reference_links::test_full_reference_link_resolved ... ok
test strip_ansi_tests::test_strip_basic_sgr ... ok
test reference_links::test_unresolved_in_bibliography ... ok
test strip_ansi_tests::test_strip_long_url ... ok
test strip_ansi_tests::test_strip_mixed_content ... ok
test strip_ansi_tests::test_strip_osc8_hyperlink ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_multiple_task_list_items ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_checked_task_list_item_lowercase ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_checked_task_list_item_uppercase ... ok
test strip_ansi_tests::test_strip_osc8_with_styling ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_regular_list_item_not_affected ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_task_list_requires_space_after_bracket ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_task_list_with_asterisk_marker ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_task_list_with_plus_marker ... ok
test task_list_tests::test_unchecked_task_list_item ... ok
test unicode_width::test_table_from_issue_28 ... ok
test wrap_image_tests::test_text_with_image_wraps_correctly ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_hyperlink_not_counted_in_width ... ok
test wrap_image_tests::test_image_markdown_not_broken_by_wrapping ... ok
test unicode_width::test_table_with_emoji ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_plain_text ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_multiple_hyperlinks ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_preserves_hyperlink_sequence ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_real_example_jsx_spec ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_with_hyperlink_visible_width ... ok
test wrap_text_tests::test_wrap_with_indent_and_hyperlink ... ok

test result: ok. 115 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.52s

   Doc-tests mdriver

running 0 tests

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
Thinking

All tests pass. Let me also run a quick manual test to make sure the feature works as expected:

$ Bash
Manual test of indented code block
echo '    line1
    line2

done' | cargo run --quiet 2>&1
    line1
    line2

done
Thinking

The manual test also works. Now let me update task 9 as completed:

TaskUpdate
{
  "taskId": "9",
  "status": "completed"
}
Updated task #9 status
Thinking

All tasks are complete. Let me list the tasks to confirm:

TaskList
{}
#6 [completed] Implement handle_in_indented_code_block handler
#7 [completed] Add IndentedCodeBlock case to emit_current_block
#1 [completed] Add InIndentedCodeBlock variant to ParserState
#2 [completed] Add IndentedCodeBlock variant to BlockBuilder
#3 [completed] Add is_indented_code_line helper function
#8 [completed] Create test file for indented code blocks
#4 [completed] Add indented code detection to handle_ready_state
#5 [completed] Add dispatch in process_line for InIndentedCodeBlock
#9 [completed] Run verification commands
Thinking

All tasks are completed. Let me provide a summary of the implementation.

Implementation complete. Here's a summary of the changes:

Changes Made

src/lib.rs: 1. Added InIndentedCodeBlock variant to ParserState enum (line 143) 2. Added IndentedCodeBlock { lines: Vec<String> } variant to BlockBuilder enum (line 170) 3. Added helper function is_indented_code_line using strip_prefix to detect 4-space or tab indentation (line 891) 4. Added dispatch case in process_line for InIndentedCodeBlock state (line 443) 5. Added detection in handle_ready_state after link definitions, before paragraph fallback (lines 518-524) 6. Added handle_in_indented_code_block handler that: - Preserves blank lines within the code block - Accumulates indented lines - Emits block when non-indented, non-blank line is encountered - Chains to handle_ready_state for the terminating line 7. Added IndentedCodeBlock case in emit_current_block that strips trailing blank lines and uses format_code_block with empty language (lines 1186-1192) 8. Added IndentedCodeBlock case in extract_block_text (line 1221)

Test Files Created: - tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code.toml - Basic indented code block test - tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_blank_lines.toml - Blank lines preserved within code block - tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_trailing_blank.toml - Trailing blank lines stripped - tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_extra_indent.toml - Extra indentation preserved - tests/fixtures/blocks/indented_code_tab.toml - Tab indentation support

Verification: - cargo fmt - Passed - cargo build - Passed - cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings - Passed - cargo test - All 120 tests pass (115 unit + 5 conformance test categories with 34 block fixtures)

create a file "deleteme.md" which contains a couple examples of indented code blocks for me to test with

Thinking

The user wants me to create a test file with examples of indented code blocks that they can use for manual testing.

📝 Write deleteme.md
/Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/deleteme.md
# Indented Code Block Examples

Here is a basic indented code block:

    function hello() {
        console.log("Hello, world!");
    }

And here is one with blank lines preserved inside:

    line 1

    line 3 (line 2 was blank)
    line 4

Here is one with extra indentation (8 spaces = 4 stripped + 4 preserved):

    outer
        inner
            deeper

Tab-indented code block:

	tab line 1
	tab line 2

Back to normal paragraph text.
File created successfully at: /Users/llimllib/code/mdriver/features/deleteme.md
Thinking

I created the file with several examples of indented code blocks for testing. The user can now test it with:

cat deleteme.md | cargo run

Created deleteme.md with several examples. You can test with:

cat deleteme.md | cargo run